‘Cattle Thieves’: Refugee Settlement, Ottoman Governmentality and Biopolitics

M. S. Saraçoğlu
{"title":"‘Cattle Thieves’: Refugee Settlement, Ottoman Governmentality and Biopolitics","authors":"M. S. Saraçoğlu","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474430999.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores the narrative function of the debates and correspondence associated with provincial governance around a particular problem: refugees. During the second half of the 19th century, more than a hundred thousand refugees came to Ottoman Bulgaria because of Russian expansion to the Caucasus. A great majority of these refugees were Circassians. This wave was contemporaneous with other demographic movements: over ten thousand Bulgarian Christians who had left for Russia as part of a population exchange between Ottomans and Russians returned back and had to be re-settled, several thousand Muslim families left a recently independent Serbia for Ottoman Empire. The refugees came at a point of economic growth in Ottoman Bulgaria and many were settled in the Vidin County. By examining how the local agents problematised the refugee settlement process in provincial correspondence, this chapter analyses the parallels between provincial politics and the imperial transformation into a liberal-capitalist social formation, where a presumably autonomous market order determined the limits of governance. This perspective is essential in looking at the empire from the provincial level and challenges the presumed path of reforms as unidirectional from the imperial centre to the provinces.","PeriodicalId":173255,"journal":{"name":"Nineteenth-Century Local Governance in Ottoman Bulgaria","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nineteenth-Century Local Governance in Ottoman Bulgaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474430999.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter explores the narrative function of the debates and correspondence associated with provincial governance around a particular problem: refugees. During the second half of the 19th century, more than a hundred thousand refugees came to Ottoman Bulgaria because of Russian expansion to the Caucasus. A great majority of these refugees were Circassians. This wave was contemporaneous with other demographic movements: over ten thousand Bulgarian Christians who had left for Russia as part of a population exchange between Ottomans and Russians returned back and had to be re-settled, several thousand Muslim families left a recently independent Serbia for Ottoman Empire. The refugees came at a point of economic growth in Ottoman Bulgaria and many were settled in the Vidin County. By examining how the local agents problematised the refugee settlement process in provincial correspondence, this chapter analyses the parallels between provincial politics and the imperial transformation into a liberal-capitalist social formation, where a presumably autonomous market order determined the limits of governance. This perspective is essential in looking at the empire from the provincial level and challenges the presumed path of reforms as unidirectional from the imperial centre to the provinces.
“偷牛贼”:难民安置、奥斯曼统治与生命政治
本章探讨了围绕一个特定问题的辩论和与省治理相关的通信的叙事功能:难民。在19世纪下半叶,由于俄罗斯向高加索地区的扩张,超过10万难民来到了奥斯曼帝国统治下的保加利亚。这些难民绝大多数是切尔克斯人。这一浪潮与其他人口流动同时发生:作为奥斯曼人和俄罗斯人之间人口交换的一部分,超过一万名保加利亚基督徒离开了俄罗斯,返回并不得不重新定居,几千个穆斯林家庭离开了最近独立的塞尔维亚,来到奥斯曼帝国。这些难民是在奥斯曼帝国统治下的保加利亚经济增长的时候来的,许多人在维丁县定居下来。通过考察地方代理人如何在省级通信中对难民安置过程提出问题,本章分析了省级政治与帝国向自由资本主义社会形态转变之间的相似之处,在这种社会形态中,一个可能自治的市场秩序决定了治理的界限。这一视角对于从省级层面观察帝国是至关重要的,并挑战了从帝国中心到各省的单向改革之路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信