Traffic classification using clustering algorithms

Jeffrey Erman, M. Arlitt, A. Mahanti
{"title":"Traffic classification using clustering algorithms","authors":"Jeffrey Erman, M. Arlitt, A. Mahanti","doi":"10.1145/1162678.1162679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classification of network traffic using port-based or payload-based analysis is becoming increasingly difficult with many peer-to-peer (P2P) applications using dynamic port numbers, masquerading techniques, and encryption to avoid detection. An alternative approach is to classify traffic by exploiting the distinctive characteristics of applications when they communicate on a network. We pursue this latter approach and demonstrate how cluster analysis can be used to effectively identify groups of traffic that are similar using only transport layer statistics. Our work considers two unsupervised clustering algorithms, namely K-Means and DBSCAN, that have previously not been used for network traffic classification. We evaluate these two algorithms and compare them to the previously used AutoClass algorithm, using empirical Internet traces. The experimental results show that both K-Means and DBSCAN work very well and much more quickly then AutoClass. Our results indicate that although DBSCAN has lower accuracy compared to K-Means and AutoClass, DBSCAN produces better clusters.","PeriodicalId":216113,"journal":{"name":"Annual ACM Workshop on Mining Network Data","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"766","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual ACM Workshop on Mining Network Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1162678.1162679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 766

Abstract

Classification of network traffic using port-based or payload-based analysis is becoming increasingly difficult with many peer-to-peer (P2P) applications using dynamic port numbers, masquerading techniques, and encryption to avoid detection. An alternative approach is to classify traffic by exploiting the distinctive characteristics of applications when they communicate on a network. We pursue this latter approach and demonstrate how cluster analysis can be used to effectively identify groups of traffic that are similar using only transport layer statistics. Our work considers two unsupervised clustering algorithms, namely K-Means and DBSCAN, that have previously not been used for network traffic classification. We evaluate these two algorithms and compare them to the previously used AutoClass algorithm, using empirical Internet traces. The experimental results show that both K-Means and DBSCAN work very well and much more quickly then AutoClass. Our results indicate that although DBSCAN has lower accuracy compared to K-Means and AutoClass, DBSCAN produces better clusters.
基于聚类算法的流量分类
使用基于端口或基于有效负载的分析对网络流量进行分类变得越来越困难,因为许多点对点(P2P)应用程序使用动态端口号、伪装技术和加密来避免检测。另一种方法是利用应用程序在网络上通信时的不同特征对流量进行分类。我们将采用后一种方法,并演示如何使用聚类分析来有效地识别仅使用传输层统计信息相似的流量组。我们的工作考虑了两种无监督聚类算法,即K-Means和DBSCAN,这两种算法以前没有用于网络流量分类。我们评估了这两种算法,并将它们与以前使用的AutoClass算法进行比较,使用经验的互联网痕迹。实验结果表明,K-Means算法和DBSCAN算法都比AutoClass算法运行速度快得多。我们的结果表明,尽管与K-Means和AutoClass相比,DBSCAN的准确率较低,但DBSCAN产生了更好的聚类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信