Effect of linear and undulating training periodization models on the repeated sprint ability and strength of soccer players

P. Gonelli, T. V. Braz, R. Verlengia, Í. L. Pellegrinotti, M. C. Cesar, Márcio A. G. Sindorf, A. Crisp, M. Aoki, C. Lopes
{"title":"Effect of linear and undulating training periodization models on the repeated sprint ability and strength of soccer players","authors":"P. Gonelli, T. V. Braz, R. Verlengia, Í. L. Pellegrinotti, M. C. Cesar, Márcio A. G. Sindorf, A. Crisp, M. Aoki, C. Lopes","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201800040013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"– Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of linear and undulating strength-power training scheme on the repeated sprint ability (RSA) and lower body strength of soccer players. Method: Twenty soccer players (under-20 category) were split into 2 groups: the linear load (LL, n=10) and the undulating load (UL, n=10). In the commencement and at the end of the 6-week pre-season period, the RSA test (6 x 35m) and the 1RM parallel squat test (1RMsquat) were conducted. The LL and UL performed the same type and number of sessions. The training stimulus in the strength training was different between LL (Weeks 1 and 2 = Muscular Endurance; Weeks 3 and 4 = Strength; Weeks 5 and 6 = Power) and UL (daily load variation in the same week). Results: A improvement in RSAmean and 1RMsquat was detected in LL and in UL. No significant difference was noted between LL vs UL for all variables. Conclusion: Both groups improved maximal muscle strength in parallel back squat and RSA. UL induced a greater gain in RSA.","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800040013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

– Purpose: The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of linear and undulating strength-power training scheme on the repeated sprint ability (RSA) and lower body strength of soccer players. Method: Twenty soccer players (under-20 category) were split into 2 groups: the linear load (LL, n=10) and the undulating load (UL, n=10). In the commencement and at the end of the 6-week pre-season period, the RSA test (6 x 35m) and the 1RM parallel squat test (1RMsquat) were conducted. The LL and UL performed the same type and number of sessions. The training stimulus in the strength training was different between LL (Weeks 1 and 2 = Muscular Endurance; Weeks 3 and 4 = Strength; Weeks 5 and 6 = Power) and UL (daily load variation in the same week). Results: A improvement in RSAmean and 1RMsquat was detected in LL and in UL. No significant difference was noted between LL vs UL for all variables. Conclusion: Both groups improved maximal muscle strength in parallel back squat and RSA. UL induced a greater gain in RSA.
线性和波动训练周期模型对足球运动员重复冲刺能力和力量的影响
-目的:研究线性和波动型力量-力量训练方案对足球运动员重复冲刺能力(RSA)和下体力量的影响。方法:将20名20岁以下足球运动员分为线性负荷组(LL, n=10)和波动负荷组(UL, n=10)。在6周的季前赛开始和结束时,进行RSA试验(6 × 35m)和1RM平行蹲试验(1rm蹲)。LL和UL执行的会话类型和会话数相同。力量训练中的训练刺激在两组之间存在差异(第1周和第2周=肌肉耐力;第3周和第4周=力量;第5周和第6周=功率)和UL(同一周的每日负载变化)。结果:在LL和UL中检测到RSAmean和1rm蹲的改善。在所有变量中,LL和UL之间没有显著差异。结论:两组均提高了平行后蹲和RSA的最大肌力。UL在RSA中诱导了更大的增益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信