The contribution of pattern recognition of seismic and morphostructural data to seismic hazard assessment

arXiv: Geophysics Pub Date : 2014-06-11 DOI:10.4430/BGTA0141
A. Peresan, A. Gorshkov, A. Soloviev, G. Panza
{"title":"The contribution of pattern recognition of seismic and morphostructural data to seismic hazard assessment","authors":"A. Peresan, A. Gorshkov, A. Soloviev, G. Panza","doi":"10.4430/BGTA0141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experience from the destructive earthquakes worldwide, which occurred over the last decade, motivated an active debate discussing the practical and theoretical limits of the seismic hazard maps based on a classical probabilistic seismic hazard approach (PSHA). Systematic comparison of the observed ground shaking with the expected one, in fact, shows that such events keep occurring where PSHA predicted seismic hazard to be low. Amongst the most debated issues is the reliable statistical characterization of the spatial and temporal properties of large earthquakes occurrence, due to the unavoidably limited observations from past events. We show that pattern recognition techniques allow addressing these issues in a formal and testable way and thus, when combined with physically sound methods for ground shaking computation, like the neo-deterministic approach (NDSHA), may produce effectively preventive seismic hazard maps. Pattern recognition analysis of morphostructural data provide quantitative and systematic criteria for identifying the areas prone to the largest events, taking into account a wide set of possible geophysical and geological data, whilst the formal identification of precursory seismicity patterns (by means of CN and M8S algorithms), duly validated by prospective testing, provides useful constraints about impending strong earthquakes at the intermediate space-time scale. According to a multi-scale approach, the information about the areas where a strong earthquake is likely to occur can be effectively integrated with different observations (e.g., geodetic and satellite data), including regional scale modelling of the stress field variations and of the seismic ground shaking, so as to identify a set of priority areas for detailed investigations of short-term precursors at local scale and for microzonation studies. Results from the pattern recognition of earthquake prone areas (M≥5.0) in the Po Plain (northern Italy), as well as from prospective testing and validation of the time-dependent NDSHA scenarios are presented, including the case of the May 20, 2012 Emilia earthquake.","PeriodicalId":390991,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: Geophysics","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4430/BGTA0141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Experience from the destructive earthquakes worldwide, which occurred over the last decade, motivated an active debate discussing the practical and theoretical limits of the seismic hazard maps based on a classical probabilistic seismic hazard approach (PSHA). Systematic comparison of the observed ground shaking with the expected one, in fact, shows that such events keep occurring where PSHA predicted seismic hazard to be low. Amongst the most debated issues is the reliable statistical characterization of the spatial and temporal properties of large earthquakes occurrence, due to the unavoidably limited observations from past events. We show that pattern recognition techniques allow addressing these issues in a formal and testable way and thus, when combined with physically sound methods for ground shaking computation, like the neo-deterministic approach (NDSHA), may produce effectively preventive seismic hazard maps. Pattern recognition analysis of morphostructural data provide quantitative and systematic criteria for identifying the areas prone to the largest events, taking into account a wide set of possible geophysical and geological data, whilst the formal identification of precursory seismicity patterns (by means of CN and M8S algorithms), duly validated by prospective testing, provides useful constraints about impending strong earthquakes at the intermediate space-time scale. According to a multi-scale approach, the information about the areas where a strong earthquake is likely to occur can be effectively integrated with different observations (e.g., geodetic and satellite data), including regional scale modelling of the stress field variations and of the seismic ground shaking, so as to identify a set of priority areas for detailed investigations of short-term precursors at local scale and for microzonation studies. Results from the pattern recognition of earthquake prone areas (M≥5.0) in the Po Plain (northern Italy), as well as from prospective testing and validation of the time-dependent NDSHA scenarios are presented, including the case of the May 20, 2012 Emilia earthquake.
地震和形态结构数据模式识别对地震危险性评估的贡献
在过去的十年中,世界范围内发生的破坏性地震的经验引发了一场积极的辩论,讨论了基于经典概率地震危险性方法(PSHA)的地震危险性图的实践和理论局限性。实际上,将观测到的地面震动与预期的地面震动进行系统比较表明,在PSHA预测的地震危险性较低的地方,这种事件不断发生。其中最具争议的问题是大地震发生的时空特性的可靠统计特征,由于不可避免地从过去的事件有限的观测。我们表明,模式识别技术允许以正式和可测试的方式解决这些问题,因此,当与地面震动计算的物理合理方法相结合时,如新确定性方法(NDSHA),可以产生有效的预防性地震危险图。形态结构数据的模式识别分析提供了定量和系统的标准,用于识别容易发生最大事件的地区,同时考虑到广泛的可能的地球物理和地质数据,而前兆地震活动模式的正式识别(通过CN和M8S算法),通过前瞻性测试适当验证,提供了在中间时空尺度上即将发生的强震的有用约束。根据多尺度方法,关于可能发生强震的地区的信息可以与不同的观测(例如大地测量和卫星数据)有效地结合起来,包括对应力场变化和地震地面震动的区域尺度模拟,从而确定一组优先区域,以便在局部尺度上详细调查短期前兆并进行微区划研究。本文介绍了意大利北部波河平原地震多发地区(M≥5.0)的模式识别结果,以及时间相关NDSHA情景的前瞻性测试和验证结果,包括2012年5月20日Emilia地震的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信