{"title":"Polluted River Problems and Games with a Permission Structure","authors":"R. Brink, Simin He, Jia-Ping Huang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2657489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polluted rivers are harmful to human, animals and plants living along it. To reduce the harm, cleaning costs are generated. However, when the river passes through several different countries or regions, a relevant question is how should the costs be shared among the agents. Ni and Wang (2007) first consider this problem as cost sharing problems on a river network, shortly called polluted river problems. They consider rivers with one spring which was generalized by Dong, Ni, and Wang (2012) to rivers with multiple springs. They introduce and axiomatize three cost sharing methods: the Local Responsibility Sharing (LRS) method, the Upstream Equal Sharing (UES) method and the Downstream Equal Sharing (DES) method. In this paper, we show that the UES and DES methods can also be obtained as the conjunctive permission value of an associated game with a permission structure, where the permission structure corresponds to the river structure and the game is determined by the cleaning costs. Then, we show that several axiomatizations of the conjunctive permission value also give axiomatizations of the UES and DES methods, of which one is comparable with the one from Dong, Ni, and Wang (2012). Besides, by applying another solution, the disjunctive permission value, to polluted river games with a permission structure we obtain a new cost allocation method for polluted river problems. We axiomatize this solution and compare it with the UES method.","PeriodicalId":340493,"journal":{"name":"Pollution eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pollution eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2657489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37
Abstract
Polluted rivers are harmful to human, animals and plants living along it. To reduce the harm, cleaning costs are generated. However, when the river passes through several different countries or regions, a relevant question is how should the costs be shared among the agents. Ni and Wang (2007) first consider this problem as cost sharing problems on a river network, shortly called polluted river problems. They consider rivers with one spring which was generalized by Dong, Ni, and Wang (2012) to rivers with multiple springs. They introduce and axiomatize three cost sharing methods: the Local Responsibility Sharing (LRS) method, the Upstream Equal Sharing (UES) method and the Downstream Equal Sharing (DES) method. In this paper, we show that the UES and DES methods can also be obtained as the conjunctive permission value of an associated game with a permission structure, where the permission structure corresponds to the river structure and the game is determined by the cleaning costs. Then, we show that several axiomatizations of the conjunctive permission value also give axiomatizations of the UES and DES methods, of which one is comparable with the one from Dong, Ni, and Wang (2012). Besides, by applying another solution, the disjunctive permission value, to polluted river games with a permission structure we obtain a new cost allocation method for polluted river problems. We axiomatize this solution and compare it with the UES method.
被污染的河流对生活在河边的人类和动植物都是有害的。为了减少危害,产生了清洁费用。然而,当河流经过几个不同的国家或地区时,一个相关的问题是如何在代理人之间分担成本。Ni和Wang(2007)首先将这一问题视为河网上的成本分担问题,简称污染河流问题。他们将Dong, Ni, and Wang(2012)提出的单泉河流归纳为多泉河流。他们介绍并公理化了三种成本分担方法:局部责任分担法(LRS)、上游平等分担法(UES)和下游平等分担法(DES)。在本文中,我们证明UES和DES方法也可以作为具有权限结构的关联博弈的合取权限值,其中权限结构对应于河流结构,博弈由清理成本决定。然后,我们证明了连接许可值的几个公理化也给出了UES和DES方法的公理化,其中一个与Dong, Ni, and Wang(2012)的方法相当。此外,将另一种解——析取权限值——应用于具有权限结构的污染河流博弈,得到了污染河流问题的一种新的成本分配方法。我们将此解公理化,并与UES方法进行比较。