Comparison of ABR Thresholds Using Linear Versus Blackman Gating Functions for Predicting Pure Tone Thresholds in Hearing-ompaired Subjects

R. Beattie, O. Kenworthy, Emily L Vanides
{"title":"Comparison of ABR Thresholds Using Linear Versus Blackman Gating Functions for Predicting Pure Tone Thresholds in Hearing-ompaired Subjects","authors":"R. Beattie, O. Kenworthy, Emily L Vanides","doi":"10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds using linear versus Blackman gating functions for predicting pure tone thresholds in subjects with sensorineural hearing losses. Twenty-six subjects with gradually-to-steeply sloping hearing loss were tested with 500, 1000, 2000 and/or 4000 Hz tone bursts. The total stimulus durations were 3 msec for both gating functions. No statistically significant mean differences were found between ABR thresholds for the linear and Blackman tone bursts at any frequency. Linear regression equations were used to describe the relationship between ABR thresholds in dB nHL and pure tone thresholds in dB HL. Standard errors of estimate of about 11 dB were obtained at 500 and 1000 Hz for both tone bursts. At 2000 and 4000 Hz, standard errors of about 6 dB were observed for both the linear and Blackman tone bursts. These data suggest that 500 and 1000 Hz tone bursts can predict pure tone thresholds within 16 dB in approximately 85% of the cases, and that the 2000 and 4000 Hz tone bursts can predict pure tone thresholds within 9 dB in approximately 85% of the cases.","PeriodicalId":114768,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/AUDI.2005.27.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study compared auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds using linear versus Blackman gating functions for predicting pure tone thresholds in subjects with sensorineural hearing losses. Twenty-six subjects with gradually-to-steeply sloping hearing loss were tested with 500, 1000, 2000 and/or 4000 Hz tone bursts. The total stimulus durations were 3 msec for both gating functions. No statistically significant mean differences were found between ABR thresholds for the linear and Blackman tone bursts at any frequency. Linear regression equations were used to describe the relationship between ABR thresholds in dB nHL and pure tone thresholds in dB HL. Standard errors of estimate of about 11 dB were obtained at 500 and 1000 Hz for both tone bursts. At 2000 and 4000 Hz, standard errors of about 6 dB were observed for both the linear and Blackman tone bursts. These data suggest that 500 and 1000 Hz tone bursts can predict pure tone thresholds within 16 dB in approximately 85% of the cases, and that the 2000 and 4000 Hz tone bursts can predict pure tone thresholds within 9 dB in approximately 85% of the cases.
用线性门控函数和Blackman门控函数预测听力比较对象纯音阈值的ABR阈值比较
本研究比较了听觉脑干反应(ABR)阈值,使用线性和Blackman门控函数预测感音神经性听力损失受试者的纯音阈值。对26名逐渐到陡峭的听力损失受试者进行了500、1000、2000和/或4000赫兹的音调爆发测试。两个门控功能的总刺激持续时间均为3 msec。在任何频率下,线性和布莱克曼音爆发的ABR阈值之间没有统计学上显著的平均差异。采用线性回归方程描述dB nHL的ABR阈值与dB HL的纯音阈值之间的关系。在500 Hz和1000 Hz的频率下,估计的标准误差约为11 dB。在2000和4000 Hz时,线性和布莱克曼音爆发的标准误差约为6 dB。这些数据表明,500和1000 Hz的音调爆发可以在大约85%的情况下预测16 dB以内的纯音阈值,2000和4000 Hz的音调爆发可以在大约85%的情况下预测9 dB以内的纯音阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信