Organizational Context and the Well-Being of Black Workers: Does Racial Composition Affect Psychological Distress?

Kevin Stainback, Kendra Jason, Charles Walter
{"title":"Organizational Context and the Well-Being of Black Workers: Does Racial Composition Affect Psychological Distress?","authors":"Kevin Stainback, Kendra Jason, Charles Walter","doi":"10.1108/S0277-283320180000032010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nOrganizational approaches to racial inequality have provided contextual insight into a host of traditional stratification outcomes (e.g., hiring, earnings, authority). This chapter extends the organizational approach by drawing on the health-stress framework to explore how organizational context affects experiential and health-related outcomes – discrimination, social support, and psychological distress. Drawing on a sample of Black workers in the United States, we examine the relationship between workplace racial composition and psychological distress, as well as two potential mediators – racial discrimination and workplace social support. Our findings reveal that psychological distress is similar for Black workers in token ( 75% Black coworkers), however, experience significantly less psychological distress than other compositional thresholds, net of individual, job, and workplace characteristics. This relationship is not explained by either racial discrimination experiences or supervisor and coworker social support. This finding suggests that researchers need to theorize and examine other protective factors stemming from coworker racial similarity.","PeriodicalId":422408,"journal":{"name":"Race, Identity and Work","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race, Identity and Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320180000032010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Abstract Organizational approaches to racial inequality have provided contextual insight into a host of traditional stratification outcomes (e.g., hiring, earnings, authority). This chapter extends the organizational approach by drawing on the health-stress framework to explore how organizational context affects experiential and health-related outcomes – discrimination, social support, and psychological distress. Drawing on a sample of Black workers in the United States, we examine the relationship between workplace racial composition and psychological distress, as well as two potential mediators – racial discrimination and workplace social support. Our findings reveal that psychological distress is similar for Black workers in token ( 75% Black coworkers), however, experience significantly less psychological distress than other compositional thresholds, net of individual, job, and workplace characteristics. This relationship is not explained by either racial discrimination experiences or supervisor and coworker social support. This finding suggests that researchers need to theorize and examine other protective factors stemming from coworker racial similarity.
组织背景与黑人工人的幸福感:种族构成是否影响心理困扰?
种族不平等的组织方法提供了对许多传统分层结果(例如,招聘、收入、权威)的上下文洞察。本章通过借鉴健康压力框架来扩展组织方法,探讨组织环境如何影响经验和健康相关的结果-歧视,社会支持和心理困扰。我们以美国黑人工人为样本,研究了工作场所种族构成与心理困扰之间的关系,以及两个潜在的中介因素——种族歧视和工作场所社会支持。我们的研究结果表明,黑人员工的心理困扰在象征性上是相似的(75%的黑人同事),然而,与其他构成阈值、个人、工作和工作场所特征相结合,黑人员工的心理困扰明显更少。这种关系既不能用种族歧视经历来解释,也不能用主管和同事的社会支持来解释。这一发现表明,研究人员需要对同事种族相似性产生的其他保护因素进行理论化和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信