A qualitative and quantitative assessment of SDN controllers

Abstract

With the increasing number of connected devices, new challenges are being raised in the networking field. Software Defined Networking (SDN) enables a greater degree of dynamism and simplification for the deployment of future 5G networks. In such networks, the controller plays a major role by being able to manage forwarding entities, such as switches, through the application of flow-based rules via a southbound (SB) interface. In turn, the controller itself can be managed by means of actions and policies provided by high-level network functions, via a northbound (NB) interface. The growth of SDN integration in new mechanisms and network architectures led to the development of different controller solutions, with a wide variety of characteristics. Despite existing studies, the most recent evaluations of SDN controllers are focused only on performance and are not up to date, since new versions of the most popular controllers are constantly being released. As such, this work provides a wider study of several open-source controllers, (namely, OpenDaylight (ODL), Open Network Operative System (ONOS), Ryu and POX), by evaluating not only their performance, but also their characteristics in a qualitative way. Taking performance as a critical issue among SDN controllers, we quantitatively evaluated several criteria by benchmarking the controllers under different operational conditions, using the Cbench tool.