Elite Theory, Media Regulation and ‘Fake News’

Daniel D. Barnhizer, Adam Candeub
{"title":"Elite Theory, Media Regulation and ‘Fake News’","authors":"Daniel D. Barnhizer, Adam Candeub","doi":"10.1017/9781839700422.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Democratic institutions rely upon the Rule of Law, and the Rule of Law depends upon rational analysis of public matters. “Fake news” undermines the Rule of Law as it derives its strength from appetitive and emotional responses in a manner that threatens both the Rule of Law and a political culture’s willingness to trust in democratic institutions. Even worse, however, the phenomenon of “fake news” creates an atmosphere in which political, media, and cultural elites can exploit fear about fake news in order to forward their own agenda and undermine democratic institutions in favor of political control by a dominant oligarchic elite. In this essay, we place the “fake news” concern in the context of media regulation in the United States. Looking to so-called elite theory, we suggest that the “fake news” cause celebre may simply be an elite power grab that United States media regulation would allow. We argue that concerns about “fake news” can best be ameliorated by more speech and improved public digital literacy and access to mechanisms to express and learn about new ideas.","PeriodicalId":422489,"journal":{"name":"Disinformation and Digital Media as a Challenge for Democracy","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disinformation and Digital Media as a Challenge for Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839700422.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Democratic institutions rely upon the Rule of Law, and the Rule of Law depends upon rational analysis of public matters. “Fake news” undermines the Rule of Law as it derives its strength from appetitive and emotional responses in a manner that threatens both the Rule of Law and a political culture’s willingness to trust in democratic institutions. Even worse, however, the phenomenon of “fake news” creates an atmosphere in which political, media, and cultural elites can exploit fear about fake news in order to forward their own agenda and undermine democratic institutions in favor of political control by a dominant oligarchic elite. In this essay, we place the “fake news” concern in the context of media regulation in the United States. Looking to so-called elite theory, we suggest that the “fake news” cause celebre may simply be an elite power grab that United States media regulation would allow. We argue that concerns about “fake news” can best be ameliorated by more speech and improved public digital literacy and access to mechanisms to express and learn about new ideas.
精英理论、媒体监管与“假新闻”
民主制度依赖于法治,而法治依赖于对公共事务的理性分析。“假新闻”破坏法治,因为它从欲望和情绪反应中获得力量,这种方式既威胁到法治,也威胁到政治文化对民主制度的信任意愿。然而,更糟糕的是,“假新闻”现象创造了一种氛围,在这种氛围中,政治、媒体和文化精英可以利用对假新闻的恐惧来推进他们自己的议程,并破坏民主制度,以支持占主导地位的寡头精英的政治控制。在本文中,我们将“假新闻”问题置于美国媒体监管的背景下。根据所谓的精英理论,我们认为,“假新闻”引起的轰动可能只是美国媒体监管允许的精英夺权行为。我们认为,对“假新闻”的担忧可以通过更多的言论和提高公众的数字素养以及获得表达和学习新思想的机制来改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信