Assessing the Effect of Social Science Education on Punitive Attitudes.

Michael T. Costelloe, Christine L. Arazan, M. Stenger
{"title":"Assessing the Effect of Social Science Education on Punitive Attitudes.","authors":"Michael T. Costelloe, Christine L. Arazan, M. Stenger","doi":"10.4119/JSSE-883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: One of the most consistent predictors of punitiveness is education, with more educated individuals expressing less punitive sentiments. While much of the earlier research focused on the level of education, some researchers have recently begun to look more closely at the nature of that education such as examining the effect of specific majors on punitiveness. This paper goes even further by also analyzing more broadly the effect of a social science education on punitive attitudes.Methods: This article presents results from an online survey of 4,000 undergraduate students attending a United States’ university.  Ordinary least squares analysis is used to examine the effect of majoring in the social sciences on support for punitive criminal justice policies, while controlling for a number of theoretically relevant variables.Findings: We find that more educated students and those majoring in social science disciplines are generally less punitive than their counterparts. If we are to unburden ourselves of the intricately intermingled economic and social costs of mass incarceration, it will require a re-visioning of how we do justice in America.  Social scientists can play a crucial role in this regard through focused research and in educating young people to be critical thinkers and thoughtful citizens.","PeriodicalId":388043,"journal":{"name":"JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSSE - Journal of Social Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4119/JSSE-883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: One of the most consistent predictors of punitiveness is education, with more educated individuals expressing less punitive sentiments. While much of the earlier research focused on the level of education, some researchers have recently begun to look more closely at the nature of that education such as examining the effect of specific majors on punitiveness. This paper goes even further by also analyzing more broadly the effect of a social science education on punitive attitudes.Methods: This article presents results from an online survey of 4,000 undergraduate students attending a United States’ university.  Ordinary least squares analysis is used to examine the effect of majoring in the social sciences on support for punitive criminal justice policies, while controlling for a number of theoretically relevant variables.Findings: We find that more educated students and those majoring in social science disciplines are generally less punitive than their counterparts. If we are to unburden ourselves of the intricately intermingled economic and social costs of mass incarceration, it will require a re-visioning of how we do justice in America.  Social scientists can play a crucial role in this regard through focused research and in educating young people to be critical thinkers and thoughtful citizens.
评估社会科学教育对惩罚态度的影响。
目的:惩罚性最一致的预测因素之一是受教育程度,受教育程度越高的人表达的惩罚情绪越少。虽然早期的研究大多集中在教育水平上,但一些研究人员最近开始更密切地关注教育的本质,比如研究特定专业对惩罚的影响。这篇论文更进一步,更广泛地分析了社会科学教育对惩罚态度的影响。方法:本文介绍了对美国一所大学的4000名本科生进行在线调查的结果。普通最小二乘分析用于检验社会科学专业对惩罚性刑事司法政策支持的影响,同时控制了一些理论上相关的变量。研究结果:我们发现,受教育程度较高的学生和社会科学专业的学生通常比他们的同龄人更少受到惩罚。如果我们要摆脱大规模监禁所带来的错综复杂的经济和社会成本,就需要重新审视我们如何在美国伸张正义。在这方面,社会科学家可以通过重点研究和教育年轻人成为批判性思考者和有思想的公民发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信