The Effects of Early Biliteracy on Thought Organisation and Syntactic Complexity in Written Production by 11-Year-Old Children

Cristiane Ely Lemke, Janaina Weissheimer, Natália Bezerra Mota, Luciana de Souza Brentano, I. Finger
{"title":"The Effects of Early Biliteracy on Thought Organisation and Syntactic Complexity in Written Production by 11-Year-Old Children","authors":"Cristiane Ely Lemke, Janaina Weissheimer, Natália Bezerra Mota, Luciana de Souza Brentano, I. Finger","doi":"10.32038/ltrq.2021.26.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent studies have emphasized the positive effects of early biliteracy on children’s linguistic and cognitive abilities. However, the extent to which one system affects the other is not totally understood (Finger & Brentano, in press). With that in mind, this paper presents the results of a study that aimed to compare the levels of syntactic complexity and thought organization in written production in Portuguese and in English. We predicted that both variables would correlate in the two languages, showing no negative effects of early biliteracy. Sixty children (M = 10.7) enrolled in 5th and 6th grades in a bilingual curriculum school in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, screened for proficiency, constituted the cohort of the study. The children’s home and community language is Portuguese, but they have been exposed to English at school for 10 hours a week for at least 5 years. Participants were asked to create a narrative based on a sequence of five images (Cambridge Assessment, 2018) one in English and one in Portuguese, in a counterbalanced order. The analysis of syntactic complexity involved the assessment of T-Units (Hunt, 1965) and thought organization was measured through the analysis of graph trajectories performed with the computational tool Speech Graphs (Mota et al., 2016, 2019). Preliminary results indicated a moderate positive correlation in the levels of syntactic complexity and in the attributes of thought connectivity in both languages, demonstrating that, as children advance in the development of more complex writing strategies in Portuguese, they progress in their written production in English to the same extent, confirming our initial predictions. These data reinforce the importance of teachers assessing students' written production in their two languages ​​from a bilingual perspective and from a conception that the languages ​​that make up the linguistic repertoire of the bilingual individual constitute a whole integrated system and not two independent systems that compete with each other (García, 2009).","PeriodicalId":350461,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.26.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Recent studies have emphasized the positive effects of early biliteracy on children’s linguistic and cognitive abilities. However, the extent to which one system affects the other is not totally understood (Finger & Brentano, in press). With that in mind, this paper presents the results of a study that aimed to compare the levels of syntactic complexity and thought organization in written production in Portuguese and in English. We predicted that both variables would correlate in the two languages, showing no negative effects of early biliteracy. Sixty children (M = 10.7) enrolled in 5th and 6th grades in a bilingual curriculum school in the metropolitan area of Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, screened for proficiency, constituted the cohort of the study. The children’s home and community language is Portuguese, but they have been exposed to English at school for 10 hours a week for at least 5 years. Participants were asked to create a narrative based on a sequence of five images (Cambridge Assessment, 2018) one in English and one in Portuguese, in a counterbalanced order. The analysis of syntactic complexity involved the assessment of T-Units (Hunt, 1965) and thought organization was measured through the analysis of graph trajectories performed with the computational tool Speech Graphs (Mota et al., 2016, 2019). Preliminary results indicated a moderate positive correlation in the levels of syntactic complexity and in the attributes of thought connectivity in both languages, demonstrating that, as children advance in the development of more complex writing strategies in Portuguese, they progress in their written production in English to the same extent, confirming our initial predictions. These data reinforce the importance of teachers assessing students' written production in their two languages ​​from a bilingual perspective and from a conception that the languages ​​that make up the linguistic repertoire of the bilingual individual constitute a whole integrated system and not two independent systems that compete with each other (García, 2009).
早期读写能力对11岁儿童写作思维组织和句法复杂性的影响
最近的研究强调早期双语对儿童语言和认知能力的积极影响。然而,一个系统对另一个系统的影响程度并不完全清楚(Finger & Brentano,出版中)。考虑到这一点,本文提出了一项研究的结果,旨在比较葡萄牙语和英语书面生产中的句法复杂性和思想组织水平。我们预测这两个变量在两种语言中是相关的,没有显示出早期双语能力的负面影响。60名儿童(M = 10.7)在巴西南格兰德州阿雷格里港市区的一所双语学校就读五年级和六年级,对他们的熟练程度进行了筛选,构成了这项研究的队列。孩子们的家庭和社区语言是葡萄牙语,但他们在学校每周接触10个小时的英语,至少有5年了。参与者被要求根据五张图片(剑桥评估,2018年)的顺序,一个用英语,一个用葡萄牙语,以平衡的顺序进行叙述。句法复杂性的分析涉及t单位的评估(Hunt, 1965),思维组织是通过使用计算工具Speech Graphs对图轨迹进行分析来衡量的(Mota等人,2016,2019)。初步结果表明,两种语言的句法复杂性水平和思维连通性属性之间存在适度的正相关,这表明,随着儿童在葡萄牙语中更复杂的写作策略的发展,他们在英语写作方面的进步也达到了同样的程度,证实了我们最初的预测。这些数据强调了教师从双语角度评估学生用两种语言写作的重要性,并强调了双语个体的语言库构成了一个完整的综合系统,而不是两个相互竞争的独立系统(García, 2009)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信