Examining the correlation of the level of wage inequality with labor market institutions

Virginia Tsoukatou
{"title":"Examining the correlation of the level of wage inequality with labor market institutions","authors":"Virginia Tsoukatou","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.3609865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Technological change is responsible for major changes in the labor market. One of the offspring of technological change is the SBTC, which is for many economists the leading cause of the increasing wage inequality. However, despite that the technological change affected similarly the majority of the developed countries, nevertheless, the level of the increase of wage inequality wasn't similar. Following the predictions of the SBTC theory, the different levels of inequality could be due to varying degrees of skill inequality between economies, possibly caused by variations in the number of skilled workers available. However, recent research shows that the difference mentioned above can explain a small percentage of the difference between countries. Therefore, most of the resulting inequality could be due to the different ways in which the higher level of skills is valued in each labor market. The position advocated in this article is that technological change is largely given for all countries without much scope to reverse. Therefore, in order to illustrate the changes in the structure of wage distribution that cause wage inequality, we need to understand how technology affects labor market institutions.In this sense, the pay inequality caused by technological progress is not a phenomenon we passively accept. On the contrary, recognizing that the structure and the way labor market institutions function is largely influenced by the way institutions respond to technological change, we can understand and maybe reverse this underlying wage inequality. Consequently, we would like to examine to what extent the reason behind the increase of wage inequality in some countries but not in others is attributed to the structure and the way the institutions of labor market work. In this article, we will attempt to examine this hypothesis by empirically elaboratingon the relationship between SBTC, inequality and labor market institutions. Keywords. Wage inequality, SBTC, Minimum wage, Trade unions, Collective bargaining. JEL. O10, J10, E50.","PeriodicalId":432468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3609865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Technological change is responsible for major changes in the labor market. One of the offspring of technological change is the SBTC, which is for many economists the leading cause of the increasing wage inequality. However, despite that the technological change affected similarly the majority of the developed countries, nevertheless, the level of the increase of wage inequality wasn't similar. Following the predictions of the SBTC theory, the different levels of inequality could be due to varying degrees of skill inequality between economies, possibly caused by variations in the number of skilled workers available. However, recent research shows that the difference mentioned above can explain a small percentage of the difference between countries. Therefore, most of the resulting inequality could be due to the different ways in which the higher level of skills is valued in each labor market. The position advocated in this article is that technological change is largely given for all countries without much scope to reverse. Therefore, in order to illustrate the changes in the structure of wage distribution that cause wage inequality, we need to understand how technology affects labor market institutions.In this sense, the pay inequality caused by technological progress is not a phenomenon we passively accept. On the contrary, recognizing that the structure and the way labor market institutions function is largely influenced by the way institutions respond to technological change, we can understand and maybe reverse this underlying wage inequality. Consequently, we would like to examine to what extent the reason behind the increase of wage inequality in some countries but not in others is attributed to the structure and the way the institutions of labor market work. In this article, we will attempt to examine this hypothesis by empirically elaboratingon the relationship between SBTC, inequality and labor market institutions. Keywords. Wage inequality, SBTC, Minimum wage, Trade unions, Collective bargaining. JEL. O10, J10, E50.
考察工资不平等水平与劳动力市场制度的相关性
摘要技术变革是劳动力市场发生重大变化的原因。技术变革的产物之一是SBTC,对许多经济学家来说,它是导致工资不平等加剧的主要原因。然而,尽管技术变革对大多数发达国家的影响相似,但工资不平等的增加程度并不相似。根据SBTC理论的预测,不同程度的不平等可能是由于经济体之间不同程度的技能不平等,可能是由可用技术工人数量的变化引起的。然而,最近的研究表明,上述差异可以解释国家之间的一小部分差异。因此,造成不平等的主要原因可能是每个劳动力市场对高水平技能的评价方式不同。这篇文章所主张的立场是,技术变革基本上是所有国家都有的,没有多少逆转的余地。因此,为了说明导致工资不平等的工资分配结构的变化,我们需要了解技术如何影响劳动力市场制度。从这个意义上说,技术进步导致的薪酬不平等不是我们被动接受的现象。相反,认识到劳动力市场制度的结构和运作方式在很大程度上受到制度对技术变革的反应方式的影响,我们可以理解并可能扭转这种潜在的工资不平等。因此,我们想要研究一些国家工资不平等加剧背后的原因在多大程度上归因于劳动力市场机构的结构和运作方式,而在其他国家则不然。在本文中,我们将尝试通过实证阐述SBTC、不平等和劳动力市场制度之间的关系来检验这一假设。关键词。工资不平等,SBTC,最低工资,工会,集体谈判。冻胶。O10 j10 e50。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信