Authentic Texts and Pakistani Learners' ESL Reading Comprehension Skills: A Mixed-Method Study

A. Aftab, Afsheen Salahuddin
{"title":"Authentic Texts and Pakistani Learners' ESL Reading Comprehension Skills: A Mixed-Method Study","authors":"A. Aftab, Afsheen Salahuddin","doi":"10.5746/LEIA/15/V6/I2/A4/AFTAB_SALAHUDDIN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper highlights the varied perspectives towards authenticity and discusses a study which investigated the effects of utilizing authentic texts instead of the traditionally used passages on the Grades VI and VII students in an Asian ESL context, namely Pakistan. The research adopted a mixed method approach incorporating an experimental design and semi-structured questionnaires and involved 154 students of two private schools. The results showed that the reading comprehension abilities of more proficient and average learners who were exposed to authentic texts improved significantly as compared to the abilities of those who only had exposure to the traditional textbook material. The questionnaire responses indicated that the students were interested in reading authentic texts and they wanted these texts incorporated in their syllabus. Thus it is proposed that authentic texts should be utilized in second language classrooms, which can lead to the development of more proficient readers. The theoretical beliefs underpinning the concept of authenticity in relation to language teaching have been undergoing considerable perceptional shifts in the last few decades which call for further investigations in actual educational environments. Initially, authenticity was only linked to texts which were taken from the world outside the classroom; thereafter with the importance being placed on language activities and learners, the scope of authenticity was extended to include varied aspects of the educational environment (Joy, 2011; Mishan, 2004). However, these changes in points of view also tended to obscure the concept. At the same time, a section of the literature (e.g., Berardo, 2006) continued to emphasize the importance of authentic texts in the acquisition of reading comprehension skills but without decisive evidence in support of the co-relation. Thus this article, while discussing the theoretical beliefs related to authentic texts, importantly presents a small scale study which attempted to provide empirical evidence indicating the positive influence of these text types on the second language reading comprehension skills of Pakistani learners.","PeriodicalId":263152,"journal":{"name":"Language Education in Asia","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Education in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/15/V6/I2/A4/AFTAB_SALAHUDDIN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper highlights the varied perspectives towards authenticity and discusses a study which investigated the effects of utilizing authentic texts instead of the traditionally used passages on the Grades VI and VII students in an Asian ESL context, namely Pakistan. The research adopted a mixed method approach incorporating an experimental design and semi-structured questionnaires and involved 154 students of two private schools. The results showed that the reading comprehension abilities of more proficient and average learners who were exposed to authentic texts improved significantly as compared to the abilities of those who only had exposure to the traditional textbook material. The questionnaire responses indicated that the students were interested in reading authentic texts and they wanted these texts incorporated in their syllabus. Thus it is proposed that authentic texts should be utilized in second language classrooms, which can lead to the development of more proficient readers. The theoretical beliefs underpinning the concept of authenticity in relation to language teaching have been undergoing considerable perceptional shifts in the last few decades which call for further investigations in actual educational environments. Initially, authenticity was only linked to texts which were taken from the world outside the classroom; thereafter with the importance being placed on language activities and learners, the scope of authenticity was extended to include varied aspects of the educational environment (Joy, 2011; Mishan, 2004). However, these changes in points of view also tended to obscure the concept. At the same time, a section of the literature (e.g., Berardo, 2006) continued to emphasize the importance of authentic texts in the acquisition of reading comprehension skills but without decisive evidence in support of the co-relation. Thus this article, while discussing the theoretical beliefs related to authentic texts, importantly presents a small scale study which attempted to provide empirical evidence indicating the positive influence of these text types on the second language reading comprehension skills of Pakistani learners.
真实文本与巴基斯坦学习者的ESL阅读理解能力:一项混合方法研究
本文强调了对真实性的不同观点,并讨论了一项研究,该研究调查了在亚洲ESL背景下(即巴基斯坦)使用真实文本而不是传统段落对六年级和七年级学生的影响。本研究采用实验设计和半结构化问卷相结合的混合方法,对两所私立学校的154名学生进行了调查。结果表明,与那些只接触传统教材的学习者相比,接触真实文本的熟练学习者和普通学习者的阅读理解能力有显著提高。问卷调查结果表明,学生们对阅读真实的文本很感兴趣,他们希望这些文本纳入他们的教学大纲。因此,我们建议在第二语言课堂中使用真实的文本,这有助于培养更熟练的读者。在过去的几十年里,支持语言教学真实性概念的理论信念经历了相当大的认知转变,这需要在实际教育环境中进行进一步的研究。最初,真实性只与课堂外的文本有关;此后,随着对语言活动和学习者的重视,真实性的范围扩大到包括教育环境的各个方面(Joy, 2011;米沙,2004)。然而,这些观点的变化也往往模糊了这一概念。与此同时,一部分文献(如Berardo, 2006)继续强调真实文本在阅读理解技能习得中的重要性,但没有决定性的证据支持这种相互关系。因此,本文在讨论与真实文本相关的理论信念的同时,重要的是提出了一项小规模的研究,试图提供实证证据,表明这些文本类型对巴基斯坦学习者的第二语言阅读理解技能有积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信