Hadiste Metin Tenkidi Faaliyetlerinin Medyaya Yansımaları: Mısır Örneği

Adil Öztekin
{"title":"Hadiste Metin Tenkidi Faaliyetlerinin Medyaya Yansımaları: Mısır Örneği","authors":"Adil Öztekin","doi":"10.29228/asrjournal.64305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some Muslim intellectuals living in Egypt in the 19th century, thinking that the Islamic world was behind the times in the face of the challenges of Western thought, started to seek remedies to get rid of this situation and as a result of these searches, reform and renewal movements were born. Among the suggestions put forward to get rid of the current bad situation, the improvement of religious sciences took place and naturally the issues related to Sunnah came to the fore. In the Egyptian media, the issues of circumcision and text criticism have come to the fore intensively. In particular, the criticism of some narrative texts over visual and written media by the rational approach has caused this issue to come to the fore more frequently. However, the fact that reformist and rational approaches brought this issue to the agenda through various media has attracted the reaction of religious circles. Although the traditional structure of the Azhar ulama and the official supervisory role of Azhar prevented this issue from being pushed to the extreme, it also prevented the problems from being addressed and producing moderate solutions. Because of this conservative attitude, private television channels turned this into an opportunity and accelerated their confusing and polemical broadcasts about circumcision issues.The subject of text criticism which caused serious debates in Egypt, paved the way for the emergence of different approaches such as reformist, traditional and Kur’aniyyun. The reformist approach argues that text criticism which is also seen in the tradition, should be prioritized in the evaluation of the narrations. The traditionalist approach opposes this idea, arguing that text criticism was done properly in the past. The Kur’aniyyun approach on the other hand, rejected the Sunnah altogether and resorted to text criticism only to prove their claims. The subject was brought to the media and caused serious discussions in written, visual and digital media. Both those who defended the text criticism and those who opposed it tried to prove their thesis through the press, media and scientific organizations.","PeriodicalId":185772,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Academic Social Resources","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Academic Social Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29228/asrjournal.64305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some Muslim intellectuals living in Egypt in the 19th century, thinking that the Islamic world was behind the times in the face of the challenges of Western thought, started to seek remedies to get rid of this situation and as a result of these searches, reform and renewal movements were born. Among the suggestions put forward to get rid of the current bad situation, the improvement of religious sciences took place and naturally the issues related to Sunnah came to the fore. In the Egyptian media, the issues of circumcision and text criticism have come to the fore intensively. In particular, the criticism of some narrative texts over visual and written media by the rational approach has caused this issue to come to the fore more frequently. However, the fact that reformist and rational approaches brought this issue to the agenda through various media has attracted the reaction of religious circles. Although the traditional structure of the Azhar ulama and the official supervisory role of Azhar prevented this issue from being pushed to the extreme, it also prevented the problems from being addressed and producing moderate solutions. Because of this conservative attitude, private television channels turned this into an opportunity and accelerated their confusing and polemical broadcasts about circumcision issues.The subject of text criticism which caused serious debates in Egypt, paved the way for the emergence of different approaches such as reformist, traditional and Kur’aniyyun. The reformist approach argues that text criticism which is also seen in the tradition, should be prioritized in the evaluation of the narrations. The traditionalist approach opposes this idea, arguing that text criticism was done properly in the past. The Kur’aniyyun approach on the other hand, rejected the Sunnah altogether and resorted to text criticism only to prove their claims. The subject was brought to the media and caused serious discussions in written, visual and digital media. Both those who defended the text criticism and those who opposed it tried to prove their thesis through the press, media and scientific organizations.
19世纪生活在埃及的一些穆斯林知识分子认为,面对西方思想的挑战,伊斯兰世界落后于时代,开始寻求摆脱这种局面的补救措施,改革和复兴运动由此诞生。在为摆脱目前的恶劣状况而提出的建议中,宗教科学的改善发生了,与圣训有关的问题自然就出现了。在埃及的媒体中,割礼和文本批评的问题已经成为焦点。特别是,一些叙事文本对视觉和书面媒体的理性批评使这一问题更加频繁地出现。然而,改革派和理性的做法通过各种媒体把这个问题提上了议程,这引起了宗教界的反应。尽管爱资哈尔乌拉玛的传统结构和爱资哈尔的官方监督角色阻止了这一问题被推向极端,但它也阻止了问题得到解决和产生温和的解决方案。由于这种保守的态度,私人电视频道把这变成了一个机会,加速了他们关于割礼问题的混乱和争论性的广播。文本批评的主题在埃及引起了严重的争论,为不同方法的出现铺平了道路,如改革派、传统派和Kur 'aniyyun。改良主义的方法认为,文本批评也出现在传统中,应该优先考虑对叙事的评价。传统主义的方法反对这种观点,认为文本批评在过去做得很好。另一方面,kuranyyun的方法完全拒绝圣训,并诉诸文本批评,只是为了证明他们的主张。这个话题被带到媒体,并在书面、视觉和数字媒体上引起了严肃的讨论。支持文本批评的人和反对文本批评的人都试图通过报刊、媒体和科学组织来证明他们的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信