But Will it Print?: Assessing Student Use of Design for Additive Manufacturing and Exploring its Effect on Design Performance and Manufacturability

Rohan Prabhu, Scarlett R. Miller, T. Simpson, N. Meisel
{"title":"But Will it Print?: Assessing Student Use of Design for Additive Manufacturing and Exploring its Effect on Design Performance and Manufacturability","authors":"Rohan Prabhu, Scarlett R. Miller, T. Simpson, N. Meisel","doi":"10.1115/detc2019-97478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Additive manufacturing (AM) enables engineers to improve the functionality and performance of their designs by adding complexity at little to no additional cost. However, AM processes also exhibit certain unique limitations, such as the presence of support material, which must be accounted for to ensure that designs can be manufactured feasibly and cost-effectively. Given these unique process characteristics, it is important for an AM-trained workforce to be able to incorporate both opportunistic and restrictive design for AM (DfAM) considerations into the design process. While AM/DfAM educational interventions have been discussed in the literature, limited research has investigated the effect of these interventions on students’ use of DfAM. Furthermore, limited research has explored how DfAM use affects the performance of students’ AM designs. This research explores this gap through an experimental study with 123 undergraduate students. Specifically, participants were exposed to either restrictive DfAM or dual DfAM (both opportunistic and restrictive) and then asked to participate in an AM design challenge. The students’ final designs were evaluated for (1) performance with respect the design objectives and constraints, and (2) the use of the various aspects of DfAM. The results showed that the use of certain DfAM considerations, such as minimum feature size and support material mass, successfully predicted the performance of the AM designs. Further, while the variations in DfAM education did not influence the performance of the AM designs, it did have an effect on the students’ use of certain DfAM concepts in their final designs. These results highlight the influence of DfAM education in bringing about an increase in students’ use of DfAM. Moreover, the results demonstrate the potential influence of DfAM in reducing build time and build material of the students’ AM designs, thus improving design performance and manufacturability.","PeriodicalId":365601,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2A: 45th Design Automation Conference","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2A: 45th Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2019-97478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) enables engineers to improve the functionality and performance of their designs by adding complexity at little to no additional cost. However, AM processes also exhibit certain unique limitations, such as the presence of support material, which must be accounted for to ensure that designs can be manufactured feasibly and cost-effectively. Given these unique process characteristics, it is important for an AM-trained workforce to be able to incorporate both opportunistic and restrictive design for AM (DfAM) considerations into the design process. While AM/DfAM educational interventions have been discussed in the literature, limited research has investigated the effect of these interventions on students’ use of DfAM. Furthermore, limited research has explored how DfAM use affects the performance of students’ AM designs. This research explores this gap through an experimental study with 123 undergraduate students. Specifically, participants were exposed to either restrictive DfAM or dual DfAM (both opportunistic and restrictive) and then asked to participate in an AM design challenge. The students’ final designs were evaluated for (1) performance with respect the design objectives and constraints, and (2) the use of the various aspects of DfAM. The results showed that the use of certain DfAM considerations, such as minimum feature size and support material mass, successfully predicted the performance of the AM designs. Further, while the variations in DfAM education did not influence the performance of the AM designs, it did have an effect on the students’ use of certain DfAM concepts in their final designs. These results highlight the influence of DfAM education in bringing about an increase in students’ use of DfAM. Moreover, the results demonstrate the potential influence of DfAM in reducing build time and build material of the students’ AM designs, thus improving design performance and manufacturability.
但它会打印吗?:评估学生对增材制造设计的使用,并探讨其对设计性能和可制造性的影响
增材制造(AM)使工程师能够通过增加复杂性来提高其设计的功能和性能,而无需额外成本。然而,增材制造工艺也表现出某些独特的局限性,例如支撑材料的存在,必须考虑到这一点,以确保设计能够可行且经济有效地制造。考虑到这些独特的工艺特征,对于经过AM培训的员工来说,能够将AM (DfAM)的机会性和限制性设计结合到设计过程中是很重要的。虽然文献中已经讨论了AM/DfAM教育干预,但有限的研究调查了这些干预对学生使用DfAM的影响。此外,有限的研究探讨了DfAM的使用如何影响学生AM设计的性能。本研究通过对123名本科生的实验研究来探讨这一差距。具体来说,参与者暴露于限制性DfAM或双重DfAM(机会性和限制性),然后被要求参加AM设计挑战。对学生的最终设计进行了评估(1)设计目标和约束方面的表现,以及(2)DfAM各方面的使用。结果表明,使用某些DfAM考虑因素,如最小特征尺寸和支撑材料质量,成功地预测了增材制造设计的性能。此外,虽然DfAM教育的变化并不影响AM设计的性能,但它确实对学生在最终设计中使用某些DfAM概念产生了影响。这些结果突出了DfAM教育对学生DfAM使用增加的影响。此外,结果表明DfAM在减少学生AM设计的构建时间和构建材料方面具有潜在的影响,从而提高设计性能和可制造性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信