Why Do Pre-Service Teachers Prefer Face to Face, Online or Hybrid Education?

S. Kaya
{"title":"Why Do Pre-Service Teachers Prefer Face to Face, Online or Hybrid Education?","authors":"S. Kaya","doi":"10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.2.1024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this cross-sectional survey, it was aimed to analyze pre-service teachers’ comparative perceptions about face-to-face (F2F) and online courses. It was also intended to discover the predictors influencing their choice of educational modes. The sample consisted of 338 pre-service teachers, selected with the cluster random sampling method, studying at two universities in Turkey. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed by the researcher. Data regarding the sample’s comparative perceptions of online and F2F courses were analyzed with descriptive statistics, while Multinomial Logistic Regression was used to analyze the predictors influencing the sample’s education preference, which had three categories: online, F2F and hybrid education. Preliminary findings revealed that the sample preferred hybrid education more than online or F2F education. Further findings revealed that as participants' satisfaction with online courses increased, as did their autonomy and the instructional effectiveness of the online courses, students' proclivity to prefer online education over F2F education increased. Additionally, gender and university type influenced this sample’s preferences between F2F and hybrid education significantly.","PeriodicalId":411995,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2023.10.2.1024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this cross-sectional survey, it was aimed to analyze pre-service teachers’ comparative perceptions about face-to-face (F2F) and online courses. It was also intended to discover the predictors influencing their choice of educational modes. The sample consisted of 338 pre-service teachers, selected with the cluster random sampling method, studying at two universities in Turkey. Data were collected using a questionnaire developed by the researcher. Data regarding the sample’s comparative perceptions of online and F2F courses were analyzed with descriptive statistics, while Multinomial Logistic Regression was used to analyze the predictors influencing the sample’s education preference, which had three categories: online, F2F and hybrid education. Preliminary findings revealed that the sample preferred hybrid education more than online or F2F education. Further findings revealed that as participants' satisfaction with online courses increased, as did their autonomy and the instructional effectiveness of the online courses, students' proclivity to prefer online education over F2F education increased. Additionally, gender and university type influenced this sample’s preferences between F2F and hybrid education significantly.
为什么职前教师更喜欢面对面、在线或混合教育?
在本横断面调查中,旨在分析职前教师对面对面(F2F)和在线课程的比较看法。研究还旨在发现影响他们选择教育模式的预测因素。本研究采用整群随机抽样方法,选取土耳其两所大学的338名职前教师。数据是通过研究人员开发的问卷收集的。使用描述性统计分析样本对在线和F2F课程的比较看法数据,使用多项逻辑回归分析影响样本教育偏好的预测因素,其中有三类:在线,F2F和混合教育。初步调查结果显示,与在线或F2F教育相比,受访者更喜欢混合教育。进一步的研究结果显示,随着参与者对在线课程的满意度提高,以及他们的自主性和在线课程的教学效果提高,学生更倾向于选择在线教育而不是F2F教育。此外,性别和大学类型显著影响了样本在F2F和混合教育之间的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信