RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR OF 2022 : HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF TRAGEDY AND LESSONS FOR NEXT GENERATIONS OF UKRAINIANS

H. Yevsieieva, G. Lysenko, Svitlana Volkova
{"title":"RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN WAR OF 2022 : HISTORICAL ORIGINS OF TRAGEDY AND LESSONS FOR NEXT GENERATIONS OF UKRAINIANS","authors":"H. Yevsieieva, G. Lysenko, Svitlana Volkova","doi":"10.30838/j.bpsacea.2312.271222.45.910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem statement. For many of our compatriots, the large-scale invasion of sovereign Ukraine by Russian troops on 24 February 2022 came as a complete suddenness, an extreme aggression by the so-called “brotherly people”. The Russian Federation has launched a full-scale invasion along the entire length of the common border, as well as from the territory of Belarus and the temporarily occupied Crimea, launched missile strikes against military and critical civilian infrastructure in the regions of Ukraine and continues to conduct military operations destroying cities, villages and the civilian population, perpetrating genocide against the Ukrainian people. But if we carefully analyse Ukrainian-Russian relations throughout the centuries of our non-neighbourliness, then the openly hostile attitude of today's the Russian establishment and the part of Russian society that supports it is not surprising. The purpose of the article is to conduct a historical analysis of the Russian aggression origins against the Ukrainian people, nation, state, culture, Ukrainians during the X−XXI centuries and outline the historical prospects of relations with the Russian state for the preservation and stable development of future generations of Ukrainians. Conclusions. The future of the Russian state depends entirely on the position of the civilized world. According to leading historians, with whom we fully agree, the destruction of the modern Russian empire could lead to the development of such post-imperial ethnic groups as the West Siberian, Far Eastern, Cossack pre-Caucasian, etc. At the same time, we can agree with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on the coalition forming advisability of countries most interested in Russia's disarmament, which could include Britain, Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and possibly Turkey. Such an alliance could be a powerful lever in opposing the revival of the Soviet Union, which was a “prison of nations” and has now been partially revived to force all civilized countries (especially those bordering Russia and Belarus) to consider further steps. So, let us remember and constantly remind our children that the policy of the Soviet leadership towards Ukraine was occupation, as well as the policy of the Russian Empire in the XIX century and the Russian Federation now. It consisted in purposeful actions to destroy Ukraine and the Ukrainian people as the bearer of national identity, history, culture and language in order to permanently consolidate the territory of Ukraine under Moscow's rule. Today, Ukraine is forced to defend its civilized European choice and state sovereignty from Russia. It is necessary to remember and prevent the mistakes and miscalculations that led to the defeat of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917−1921, the main of which were internal disagreements in the face of external aggression, which led to the occupation of the territory. Today we have a chance to end this war for the sovereignty of our state, for the life of the people in it and finally bury the empire of evil.","PeriodicalId":228894,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30838/j.bpsacea.2312.271222.45.910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem statement. For many of our compatriots, the large-scale invasion of sovereign Ukraine by Russian troops on 24 February 2022 came as a complete suddenness, an extreme aggression by the so-called “brotherly people”. The Russian Federation has launched a full-scale invasion along the entire length of the common border, as well as from the territory of Belarus and the temporarily occupied Crimea, launched missile strikes against military and critical civilian infrastructure in the regions of Ukraine and continues to conduct military operations destroying cities, villages and the civilian population, perpetrating genocide against the Ukrainian people. But if we carefully analyse Ukrainian-Russian relations throughout the centuries of our non-neighbourliness, then the openly hostile attitude of today's the Russian establishment and the part of Russian society that supports it is not surprising. The purpose of the article is to conduct a historical analysis of the Russian aggression origins against the Ukrainian people, nation, state, culture, Ukrainians during the X−XXI centuries and outline the historical prospects of relations with the Russian state for the preservation and stable development of future generations of Ukrainians. Conclusions. The future of the Russian state depends entirely on the position of the civilized world. According to leading historians, with whom we fully agree, the destruction of the modern Russian empire could lead to the development of such post-imperial ethnic groups as the West Siberian, Far Eastern, Cossack pre-Caucasian, etc. At the same time, we can agree with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on the coalition forming advisability of countries most interested in Russia's disarmament, which could include Britain, Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and possibly Turkey. Such an alliance could be a powerful lever in opposing the revival of the Soviet Union, which was a “prison of nations” and has now been partially revived to force all civilized countries (especially those bordering Russia and Belarus) to consider further steps. So, let us remember and constantly remind our children that the policy of the Soviet leadership towards Ukraine was occupation, as well as the policy of the Russian Empire in the XIX century and the Russian Federation now. It consisted in purposeful actions to destroy Ukraine and the Ukrainian people as the bearer of national identity, history, culture and language in order to permanently consolidate the territory of Ukraine under Moscow's rule. Today, Ukraine is forced to defend its civilized European choice and state sovereignty from Russia. It is necessary to remember and prevent the mistakes and miscalculations that led to the defeat of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917−1921, the main of which were internal disagreements in the face of external aggression, which led to the occupation of the territory. Today we have a chance to end this war for the sovereignty of our state, for the life of the people in it and finally bury the empire of evil.
2022年的俄乌战争:悲剧的历史根源和给下一代乌克兰人的教训
问题陈述。对我们的许多同胞来说,2022年2月24日俄罗斯军队对乌克兰主权的大规模入侵是完全突然的,是所谓“兄弟人民”的极端侵略。俄罗斯联邦沿着整个共同边界以及从白俄罗斯领土和暂时被占领的克里米亚发动了全面入侵,对乌克兰各地区的军事和重要民用基础设施发动了导弹袭击,并继续进行军事行动,摧毁城市、村庄和平民,对乌克兰人民进行种族灭绝。但是,如果我们仔细分析几个世纪以来两国的非邻国关系,那么今天俄罗斯当权派和支持它的俄罗斯社会部分公开敌视的态度就不足为奇了。本文的目的是对俄罗斯在X - 21世纪对乌克兰人民、民族、国家、文化、乌克兰人的侵略起源进行历史分析,并概述与俄罗斯国家关系的历史前景,以保护和稳定发展未来几代乌克兰人。结论。俄罗斯国家的未来完全取决于文明世界的立场。根据我们完全同意的著名历史学家的说法,现代俄罗斯帝国的毁灭可能导致后帝国民族的发展,如西西伯利亚人、远东人、哥萨克人、前高加索人等。与此同时,我们可以同意英国首相鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)的观点,即由对俄罗斯裁军最感兴趣的国家组成联盟是明智的,其中可能包括英国、乌克兰、波兰、立陶宛、拉脱维亚、爱沙尼亚,可能还有土耳其。这样的联盟可以成为反对苏联复兴的有力杠杆,苏联曾经是一个“国家的监狱”,现在已经部分复活,迫使所有文明国家(特别是那些与俄罗斯和白俄罗斯接壤的国家)考虑采取进一步措施。因此,让我们记住并不断提醒我们的孩子,苏联领导人对乌克兰的政策是占领,以及19世纪的俄罗斯帝国和现在的俄罗斯联邦的政策。它的目的是摧毁乌克兰和作为民族特征、历史、文化和语言载体的乌克兰人民,以便将乌克兰领土永久地巩固在莫斯科的统治之下。今天,乌克兰被迫捍卫其文明的欧洲选择和国家主权,不受俄罗斯的侵犯。有必要记住并防止导致1917 - 1921年乌克兰革命失败的错误和误判,其中主要是面对外部侵略的内部分歧,导致领土被占领。今天,我们有机会结束这场战争,为了我们国家的主权,为了人民的生命,最终埋葬邪恶的帝国。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信