Enhancing Security in the Pacific Through Regionalism

Viliame Wilikilagi
{"title":"Enhancing Security in the Pacific Through Regionalism","authors":"Viliame Wilikilagi","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1628409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Auckland Declaration of the Pacific Islands Forum adopted the following as part of its overarching vision which brought about the Pacific Plan: Leaders believe the Pacific region can, should and will be a region of peace, harmony, security and economic prosperity, so that all of its people can lead free and worthwhile lives. It is interesting to note that at the outset of the formulation of the Pacific Plan, the vision upon which it was drafted encapsulated the Forum Island Countries (FIC) desire for the Pacific to be a region of peace, harmony and security which will lead to economic prosperity and ensure the freedom of all our people. However, far from what the name of the region implies, the Pacific has not been a pacific (meaning peaceful) region and has had a share of its conflicts, constitutional crises, political violence that has even led to some academics such as Reilly to suggest that the Pacific is becoming Africanized particularly due to the conflict and crises experienced in the Melanesian countries of the FIC leading to its labeling as the “Arc of Instability”. Notwithstanding, other academics such as Firth contend that Oceania is not Africa and has its unique challenges, constraints regarding security but there has been general consensus that the security situation in a number of FIC has deteriorated having a negative impact on the general outlook for the region. This paper aims at discussing whether security for the pacific can be enhanced through regionalism. In order to analyze this I will discuss the security issues that has affected the region focusing in particular on the period after 2001; what are some of the regional measures and the regional mechanisms that have been used by the Pacific Island Forum as a response to these security issues; the role of Australia and New Zealand in the implementation of the regional responses; and to determine the effectiveness of these regional responses through analyzing their application in the Solomon Islands crisis and in Fiji post 2006.","PeriodicalId":166057,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Global & Regional Governance (Topic)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Global & Regional Governance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1628409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Auckland Declaration of the Pacific Islands Forum adopted the following as part of its overarching vision which brought about the Pacific Plan: Leaders believe the Pacific region can, should and will be a region of peace, harmony, security and economic prosperity, so that all of its people can lead free and worthwhile lives. It is interesting to note that at the outset of the formulation of the Pacific Plan, the vision upon which it was drafted encapsulated the Forum Island Countries (FIC) desire for the Pacific to be a region of peace, harmony and security which will lead to economic prosperity and ensure the freedom of all our people. However, far from what the name of the region implies, the Pacific has not been a pacific (meaning peaceful) region and has had a share of its conflicts, constitutional crises, political violence that has even led to some academics such as Reilly to suggest that the Pacific is becoming Africanized particularly due to the conflict and crises experienced in the Melanesian countries of the FIC leading to its labeling as the “Arc of Instability”. Notwithstanding, other academics such as Firth contend that Oceania is not Africa and has its unique challenges, constraints regarding security but there has been general consensus that the security situation in a number of FIC has deteriorated having a negative impact on the general outlook for the region. This paper aims at discussing whether security for the pacific can be enhanced through regionalism. In order to analyze this I will discuss the security issues that has affected the region focusing in particular on the period after 2001; what are some of the regional measures and the regional mechanisms that have been used by the Pacific Island Forum as a response to these security issues; the role of Australia and New Zealand in the implementation of the regional responses; and to determine the effectiveness of these regional responses through analyzing their application in the Solomon Islands crisis and in Fiji post 2006.
通过地区主义加强太平洋安全
太平洋岛屿论坛《奥克兰宣言》将以下内容作为其总体愿景的一部分,并由此提出了《太平洋计划》:领导人相信,太平洋地区能够、应该、也将成为一个和平、和谐、安全和经济繁荣的地区,使所有人民都能过上自由和有价值的生活。值得注意的是,在制定《太平洋计划》的一开始,起草该计划所依据的愿景就包含了论坛岛屿国家希望太平洋成为一个和平、和谐与安全的区域的愿望,这将导致经济繁荣并确保我们所有人民的自由。然而,远非该地区的名称所暗示的那样,太平洋并不是一个和平的地区,它也有冲突,宪法危机,政治暴力,甚至导致一些学者,如Reilly,认为太平洋正在变得非洲化,特别是由于FIC的美拉尼西亚国家经历的冲突和危机,导致其被贴上“不稳定之弧”的标签。尽管如此,Firth等其他学者认为大洋洲不是非洲,在安全方面有其独特的挑战和限制,但普遍的共识是,一些大洋洲的安全局势已经恶化,对该区域的总体前景产生了负面影响。本文旨在探讨是否可以通过区域主义来加强太平洋安全。为了分析这一点,我将讨论影响该地区的安全问题,特别侧重于2001年之后的时期;太平洋岛屿论坛采取了哪些区域措施和区域机制来应对这些安全问题;澳大利亚和新西兰在执行区域对策方面的作用;并通过分析其在所罗门群岛危机和2006年后斐济危机中的应用情况,确定这些区域应对措施的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信