Health technology assessment in the context of private and public models of national health systems

G. Turchetti, E. Geisler
{"title":"Health technology assessment in the context of private and public models of national health systems","authors":"G. Turchetti, E. Geisler","doi":"10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing costs of healthcare delivery in all industrialized countries are raising serious concerns about the financial sustainability of national and regional healthcare delivery systems. Studies have shown that innovations in medical technology are one of the stronger factors that drive the upward trend of healthcare delivery costs. Many national and regional healthcare agencies and policy makers are recognizing the need for more accurate knowledge on the generation and diffusion of innovations in healthcare technologies. The focus of this paper is a comparison of the assessment of health and medical technologies in two different models of national health delivery systems: Italy and the United States. The role of health technology as a significant driver of the rising costs of healthcare delivery is well documented. Less studied is the manner in which health technologies are acquired and adopted by providers in different national systems. The authors frame the issues and compare the factors that impinge upon the diffusion of medical technologies from industry to providers in a publicly planned and funded health system and in a mostly privately-funded national health system. As the two national systems seem to converge in many aspects of national policy making, the authors explore the assessment of healthcare technologies in the short and longer terms. Are there differences and similarities in the assessment methodologies used by the different systems and, if so, how do these affect the healthcare delivery system? The authors suggest some possible answers.","PeriodicalId":185147,"journal":{"name":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","volume":"55 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PICMET '09 - 2009 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PICMET.2009.5261739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The increasing costs of healthcare delivery in all industrialized countries are raising serious concerns about the financial sustainability of national and regional healthcare delivery systems. Studies have shown that innovations in medical technology are one of the stronger factors that drive the upward trend of healthcare delivery costs. Many national and regional healthcare agencies and policy makers are recognizing the need for more accurate knowledge on the generation and diffusion of innovations in healthcare technologies. The focus of this paper is a comparison of the assessment of health and medical technologies in two different models of national health delivery systems: Italy and the United States. The role of health technology as a significant driver of the rising costs of healthcare delivery is well documented. Less studied is the manner in which health technologies are acquired and adopted by providers in different national systems. The authors frame the issues and compare the factors that impinge upon the diffusion of medical technologies from industry to providers in a publicly planned and funded health system and in a mostly privately-funded national health system. As the two national systems seem to converge in many aspects of national policy making, the authors explore the assessment of healthcare technologies in the short and longer terms. Are there differences and similarities in the assessment methodologies used by the different systems and, if so, how do these affect the healthcare delivery system? The authors suggest some possible answers.
国家卫生系统公私模式背景下的卫生技术评估
在所有工业化国家,卫生保健服务的成本不断增加,这引起了人们对国家和区域卫生保健服务系统的财政可持续性的严重关切。研究表明,医疗技术的创新是推动医疗保健服务成本上升趋势的重要因素之一。许多国家和区域卫生保健机构和决策者正在认识到需要更准确地了解卫生保健技术创新的产生和传播。本文的重点是比较两种不同模式的国家卫生服务系统:意大利和美国的卫生和医疗技术的评估。卫生技术作为医疗保健服务成本上升的重要驱动因素的作用已得到充分证明。研究较少的是不同国家系统的提供者获取和采用卫生技术的方式。作者提出了这些问题,并比较了在公共计划和资助的卫生系统和主要由私人资助的国家卫生系统中,影响医疗技术从行业向提供者传播的因素。由于这两个国家体系似乎在国家政策制定的许多方面趋于一致,作者探讨了短期和长期医疗保健技术的评估。不同系统使用的评估方法是否有异同,如果有,这些对医疗保健服务系统有何影响?作者提出了一些可能的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信