Aplikasi Citra Drone untuk Klasifikasi Vegetasi di Cagar Alam Curah Manis Sempolan 1 Menggunakan Metode Manual, Object Base Image Analysis (OBIA), dan K-Means

Rufiani Nadzirah, Yoga Rezky Saputra, I. Indarto
{"title":"Aplikasi Citra Drone untuk Klasifikasi Vegetasi di Cagar Alam Curah Manis Sempolan 1 Menggunakan Metode Manual, Object Base Image Analysis (OBIA), dan K-Means","authors":"Rufiani Nadzirah, Yoga Rezky Saputra, I. Indarto","doi":"10.19184/j-agt.v16i02.28567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, vegetation classification can be used to find out the latest information about the characteristics and distribution of vegetation in an area. However, a conservative process to differentiate vegetation was ineffective. Some of those limitations are poor accessibility that does work less safety, time-consuming, and needs a lot of human resources. On the other hand, remote sensing offers solutions that cannot be done by the simple method, such as how to take the data, time-consuming are less, and human resource needs are less as well. The purpose of this study was to classify, measured the area of each vegetation, and compared the effectiveness of the unsupervised used K-Means algorithm and supervised used Object Base Image Analysis algorithm methods vegetation classification. For accuracy calculation with confusion matrix, the classification results of the two methods were compared with the manual digitization method. Data was taken using drones in the area of the Curah Manis Sempolan Nature Reserve 1. Classification of vegetation consists of 5 vegetation types, which was apak, bush, pine, bendo, and dadap. The total area of the study area was 1.633 ha, and area vegetation of each classification was apak 0.224 ha; bush 0.748 ha; pine 0.394 ha; bendo 0.222 ha; and dadap 0.045 ha. The results of the calculation of accuracy showed that the unsupervised method had a value for overall accuracy of 80% and kappa accuracy of 73.58%. Then, in the supervised for overall accuracy is 68% and kappa accuracy of 58.72%. \nKeywords: classification, drone, remote sensing, satellite","PeriodicalId":340373,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Agroteknologi","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Agroteknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/j-agt.v16i02.28567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, vegetation classification can be used to find out the latest information about the characteristics and distribution of vegetation in an area. However, a conservative process to differentiate vegetation was ineffective. Some of those limitations are poor accessibility that does work less safety, time-consuming, and needs a lot of human resources. On the other hand, remote sensing offers solutions that cannot be done by the simple method, such as how to take the data, time-consuming are less, and human resource needs are less as well. The purpose of this study was to classify, measured the area of each vegetation, and compared the effectiveness of the unsupervised used K-Means algorithm and supervised used Object Base Image Analysis algorithm methods vegetation classification. For accuracy calculation with confusion matrix, the classification results of the two methods were compared with the manual digitization method. Data was taken using drones in the area of the Curah Manis Sempolan Nature Reserve 1. Classification of vegetation consists of 5 vegetation types, which was apak, bush, pine, bendo, and dadap. The total area of the study area was 1.633 ha, and area vegetation of each classification was apak 0.224 ha; bush 0.748 ha; pine 0.394 ha; bendo 0.222 ha; and dadap 0.045 ha. The results of the calculation of accuracy showed that the unsupervised method had a value for overall accuracy of 80% and kappa accuracy of 73.58%. Then, in the supervised for overall accuracy is 68% and kappa accuracy of 58.72%. Keywords: classification, drone, remote sensing, satellite
无人机图片应用于自然降水1号的草案分类,采用人工方法,客观基层分析(OBIA)和k -手段
如今,植被分类可以用来了解一个地区植被的特征和分布的最新信息。然而,保守的植被区分方法是无效的。其中一些限制是可访问性差,工作不安全,耗时,需要大量人力资源。另一方面,遥感提供了简单方法无法完成的解决方案,例如如何获取数据,耗时更少,人力资源需求也更少。本研究的目的是对每个植被的面积进行分类和测量,并比较无监督使用的K-Means算法和有监督使用的Object Base Image Analysis算法的植被分类效果。用混淆矩阵计算准确率,将两种方法的分类结果与人工数字化方法进行比较。数据是在Curah Manis Sempolan自然保护区使用无人机拍摄的。植被分类为5种植被类型,分别为:灌丛、松林、本草和荒草。研究区总面积为1.633 ha,各分类植被面积为0.224 ha;灌木0.748 ha;松树0.394 ha;Bendo 0.222 ha;dadap 0.045公顷。精度计算结果表明,无监督方法的总体精度为80%,kappa精度为73.58%。然后,在监督下,总体准确率为68%,kappa准确率为58.72%。关键词:分类,无人机,遥感,卫星
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信