Methods for Forecasting and Evaluation of Reservoir Properties Under Conditions of Its Development Using Hydraulic Fracturing Technology

A. Alekseev
{"title":"Methods for Forecasting and Evaluation of Reservoir Properties Under Conditions of Its Development Using Hydraulic Fracturing Technology","authors":"A. Alekseev","doi":"10.2118/191679-18RPTC-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Development of well completion and reservoir stimulation technologies has fuzzified the well-established concepts that have been commonly used to identify and estimate productive natural reservoirs. As multi-stage hydraulic fracturing (MSHFC) is broadly applied, the petrophysical criteria in horizontal wells based on the definition of reservoir bottom interface turn out to be inefficient. This may be exemplified by quite a large-scale development of hard-to-recover oil limited to low-permeable rock (\"tight oil\") and shale rocks (\"shale oil\") whose reservoir properties are near cut-off points or even much lower. The current situation speaks for the necessity to review the existing petrophysical approaches to the estimating of the potential of natural hydrocarbon (HC) reservoirs. It is obvious that the downward revision of cut-off points for the reservoir will not be enough in such situation and we will need to improve the mere criteria applicable to estimating the productivity potential. Thus, it becomes a priority to develop a conceptually new approach to the estimating of rock productivity potential keeping in mind their future industry-related stimulation using state-of-the-art technologies. The said objective goes far beyond the investigation of standard parameters which are normally referred to as volumetric parameters (e.g., net pay porosity, permeability and oil saturation factor) and it has a much more complex and comprehensive nature. It is equally important to be able to determine the characteristics of the stimulated zone of the formation created as a result of technogenic impact of hydraulic fracturing methods.\n Productivity of a contemporary well depends on a broad range of geological and technological parameters, and it is impossible to break them down by the degree of the effect that they have. Nevertheless, three main components, i.e., reservoir quality, drilling quality and completion quality are normally identified, which determine the productivity of horizontal wells with multifrac. In this case, the reservoir quality is understood as a set of parameters that characterizes the properties of a reservoir in its natural mode of occurrence. Drilling quality shows how the well design and its drilling in the reservoir comply with the key objectives for ensuring efficient reservoir stimulation and achieving maximum productivity in the natural mode of the available reservoir. Completion quality means a set of parameters that characterize the efficiency of the completed actions to prepare a well for HC production. Completion includes, inter alia, a package of HFC jobs.\n Therefore, one can formulate the key objectives to estimate potential productivity of natural reservoirs in their development conditions using hydraulic fracturing; what should be done: Estimate the resource base of a potential development target and identify the share of the reserves technologically available for the implemented production technology;Characterize the susceptibility of the potential target to technology-related stimulation using HFC;Justify the optimized position of a horizontal borehole in section based on the requirements applicable to the geometry of the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV);Ensure that the horizontal borehole is drilled in the pre-set target interval;Define the completion design and make HFC design calculations for it;Carry out monitoring to identify the actual SRV geometry and analyze it for compliance with the planned design;Carry out effiency analysis of the stimulation in terms of well operation and depletion of the resource base;Based on the performed work, prepare a corrective action plan for efficiency improvement of the stimulation.\n Following the logic of three main components that determine the productivity of horizontal wells with multifrac, the listed objectives may be broken into the following groups: Nos. 1 and 2 refer to reservoir quality (RQ);Nos. 2-4 are concerned with the assurance of relevant drilling quality (DQ);Nos. 5-8 are directly related to completion quality (CQ).\n The above objectives outline the agenda of a new area in petroleum engineering, which may be called the \"Petrophysics of artificial reservoir\". It is suggested in this manuscript to highlight possible methods to address those issues and to use cases to test the efficiency of those approaches.","PeriodicalId":151841,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 15, 2018","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 15, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191679-18RPTC-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Development of well completion and reservoir stimulation technologies has fuzzified the well-established concepts that have been commonly used to identify and estimate productive natural reservoirs. As multi-stage hydraulic fracturing (MSHFC) is broadly applied, the petrophysical criteria in horizontal wells based on the definition of reservoir bottom interface turn out to be inefficient. This may be exemplified by quite a large-scale development of hard-to-recover oil limited to low-permeable rock ("tight oil") and shale rocks ("shale oil") whose reservoir properties are near cut-off points or even much lower. The current situation speaks for the necessity to review the existing petrophysical approaches to the estimating of the potential of natural hydrocarbon (HC) reservoirs. It is obvious that the downward revision of cut-off points for the reservoir will not be enough in such situation and we will need to improve the mere criteria applicable to estimating the productivity potential. Thus, it becomes a priority to develop a conceptually new approach to the estimating of rock productivity potential keeping in mind their future industry-related stimulation using state-of-the-art technologies. The said objective goes far beyond the investigation of standard parameters which are normally referred to as volumetric parameters (e.g., net pay porosity, permeability and oil saturation factor) and it has a much more complex and comprehensive nature. It is equally important to be able to determine the characteristics of the stimulated zone of the formation created as a result of technogenic impact of hydraulic fracturing methods. Productivity of a contemporary well depends on a broad range of geological and technological parameters, and it is impossible to break them down by the degree of the effect that they have. Nevertheless, three main components, i.e., reservoir quality, drilling quality and completion quality are normally identified, which determine the productivity of horizontal wells with multifrac. In this case, the reservoir quality is understood as a set of parameters that characterizes the properties of a reservoir in its natural mode of occurrence. Drilling quality shows how the well design and its drilling in the reservoir comply with the key objectives for ensuring efficient reservoir stimulation and achieving maximum productivity in the natural mode of the available reservoir. Completion quality means a set of parameters that characterize the efficiency of the completed actions to prepare a well for HC production. Completion includes, inter alia, a package of HFC jobs. Therefore, one can formulate the key objectives to estimate potential productivity of natural reservoirs in their development conditions using hydraulic fracturing; what should be done: Estimate the resource base of a potential development target and identify the share of the reserves technologically available for the implemented production technology;Characterize the susceptibility of the potential target to technology-related stimulation using HFC;Justify the optimized position of a horizontal borehole in section based on the requirements applicable to the geometry of the stimulated reservoir volume (SRV);Ensure that the horizontal borehole is drilled in the pre-set target interval;Define the completion design and make HFC design calculations for it;Carry out monitoring to identify the actual SRV geometry and analyze it for compliance with the planned design;Carry out effiency analysis of the stimulation in terms of well operation and depletion of the resource base;Based on the performed work, prepare a corrective action plan for efficiency improvement of the stimulation. Following the logic of three main components that determine the productivity of horizontal wells with multifrac, the listed objectives may be broken into the following groups: Nos. 1 and 2 refer to reservoir quality (RQ);Nos. 2-4 are concerned with the assurance of relevant drilling quality (DQ);Nos. 5-8 are directly related to completion quality (CQ). The above objectives outline the agenda of a new area in petroleum engineering, which may be called the "Petrophysics of artificial reservoir". It is suggested in this manuscript to highlight possible methods to address those issues and to use cases to test the efficiency of those approaches.
水力压裂技术开发条件下储层物性预测与评价方法
完井和储层增产技术的发展已经模糊了通常用于识别和估计生产性天然储层的既定概念。随着多级水力压裂(MSHFC)的广泛应用,基于储层底界面定义的水平井岩石物理标准变得低效。低渗透岩石(“致密油”)和页岩(“页岩油”)中难以回收的石油的大规模开发可能就是一个例子,这些岩石的储层性质接近临界值,甚至更低。目前的情况表明,有必要对现有的岩石物理方法进行审查,以估计天然油气藏的潜力。显然,在这种情况下,向下修正油藏的截止点是不够的,我们需要改进适用于估计生产力潜力的单纯标准。因此,开发一种概念上的新方法来估计岩石生产力潜力成为当务之急,同时考虑到未来与行业相关的增产措施,使用最先进的技术。上述目标远远超出了通常称为体积参数的标准参数(例如,净产层孔隙度、渗透率和含油饱和度)的研究,并且具有更加复杂和全面的性质。同样重要的是,能够确定由于水力压裂方法的技术影响而形成的地层的受刺激层的特征。现代油井的产量取决于一系列广泛的地质和技术参数,不可能根据它们的影响程度来分解它们。然而,油藏质量、钻井质量和完井质量通常是决定多段压裂水平井产能的三个主要因素。在这种情况下,储层质量被理解为表征储层自然产状特征的一组参数。钻井质量反映了油藏的井设计及其钻井是否符合确保有效油藏增产和在现有油藏的自然模式下实现最大产能的关键目标。完井质量指的是一组参数,这些参数表征了为生产HC做好准备的完井作业的效率。除其他外,完成包括一揽子HFC工作。因此,人们可以制定关键目标,利用水力压裂估算天然储层在开发条件下的潜在产能;应该怎么做:评估潜在开发目标的资源基础,确定技术上可用于实施生产技术的储量份额;利用HFC表征潜在目标对技术相关增产的敏感性;根据增产油藏体积(SRV)的几何形状要求,确定水平井在剖面上的最佳位置确定完井设计并进行HFC设计计算;进行监测,确定实际SRV几何形状,并分析其是否符合计划设计;从井的运行和资源基的消耗方面进行增产效率分析;根据已完成的工作,制定增产效率提高的纠正措施计划。根据决定多裂缝水平井产能的三个主要组成部分的逻辑,列出的目标可以分为以下几组:第1和第2组是指储层质量(RQ);2-4项涉及相关钻井质量(DQ)的保证;5-8项与完井质量直接相关。上述目标概述了石油工程中一个新领域的议程,该领域可称为“人工油藏岩石物理学”。本文建议强调解决这些问题的可能方法,并使用案例来测试这些方法的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信