{"title":"Parameterized Max Min Feedback Vertex Set","authors":"M. Lampis, N. Melissinos, Manolis Vasilakis","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2302.09604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, Max Min FVS asks whether there exists a minimal set of vertices of size at least $k$ whose deletion destroys all cycles. We present several results that improve upon the state of the art of the parameterized complexity of this problem with respect to both structural and natural parameters. Using standard DP techniques, we first present an algorithm of time $\\textrm{tw}^{O(\\textrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$, significantly generalizing a recent algorithm of Gaikwad et al. of time $\\textrm{vc}^{O(\\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$, where $\\textrm{tw}, \\textrm{vc}$ denote the input graph's treewidth and vertex cover respectively. Subsequently, we show that both of these algorithms are essentially optimal, since a $\\textrm{vc}^{o(\\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$ algorithm would refute the ETH. With respect to the natural parameter $k$, the aforementioned recent work by Gaikwad et al. claimed an FPT branching algorithm with complexity $10^k n^{O(1)}$. We point out that this algorithm is incorrect and present a branching algorithm of complexity $9.34^k n^{O(1)}$.","PeriodicalId":369104,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.09604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k$, Max Min FVS asks whether there exists a minimal set of vertices of size at least $k$ whose deletion destroys all cycles. We present several results that improve upon the state of the art of the parameterized complexity of this problem with respect to both structural and natural parameters. Using standard DP techniques, we first present an algorithm of time $\textrm{tw}^{O(\textrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$, significantly generalizing a recent algorithm of Gaikwad et al. of time $\textrm{vc}^{O(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$, where $\textrm{tw}, \textrm{vc}$ denote the input graph's treewidth and vertex cover respectively. Subsequently, we show that both of these algorithms are essentially optimal, since a $\textrm{vc}^{o(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$ algorithm would refute the ETH. With respect to the natural parameter $k$, the aforementioned recent work by Gaikwad et al. claimed an FPT branching algorithm with complexity $10^k n^{O(1)}$. We point out that this algorithm is incorrect and present a branching algorithm of complexity $9.34^k n^{O(1)}$.
给定一个图$G$和一个整数$k$, Max Min FVS问是否存在一个最小的顶点集,其大小至少为$k$,其删除会破坏所有循环。我们提出了几个结果,这些结果改进了该问题在结构参数和自然参数方面的参数化复杂性的最新状态。使用标准DP技术,我们首先提出了时间$\textrm{tw}^{O(\textrm{tw})}n^{O(1)}$的算法,显著推广了Gaikwad等人最近的时间$\textrm{vc}^{O(\textrm{vc})}n^{O(1)}$的算法,其中$\textrm{tw}, \textrm{vc}$分别表示输入图的树宽和顶点覆盖。随后,我们证明这两种算法本质上都是最优的,因为$\textrm{vc}^{o(\textrm{vc})}n^{o(1)}$算法会反驳ETH。对于自然参数$k$,前面提到的Gaikwad等人提出了一个复杂度$10^k n^{O(1)}$的FPT分支算法。我们指出了该算法的不正确,并给出了复杂度为$9.34^k n^{O(1)}$的分支算法。