Assessing Factors Associated with COVID19 Risk in Asthma

C. Bloom, P. Cullinan, J. Wedzicha
{"title":"Assessing Factors Associated with COVID19 Risk in Asthma","authors":"C. Bloom, P. Cullinan, J. Wedzicha","doi":"10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"RATIONALE Several factors may be associated with the apparent reduced risk of severe COVID-19 disease in asthma patients. These include a proposed protective effect from inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or from a type-2 immune airway response. Large UK population cohorts have found conflicting results, but each had missing information on asthma phenotype, including exacerbation history or markers of type-2 inflammation. Protective factors may be determined by comparing the outcomes of asthma patients to other patients using ICS or patients that have similar inflammation. This will be done using a national primary care database linked to secondary care data and Public Health England (PHE) COVID-19 data. METHODS From a primary care database covering around 15% of the UK population, we drew three cohorts of adults (>17 years) with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or allergic rhinitis, and a general population cohort matched by age, gender and primary care practice. COVID-19 infection was defined using three sources: primary care records (confirmed and suspected cases), hospital admissions or PHE data from their surveillance system. Preliminary analysis calculated the proportion of patients diagnosed as suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care between 1st February and 22nd June 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations between risk factors and COVID-19. RESULTS We identified 729,045 patients with asthma, 280,892 with COPD, 137,312 with allergic rhinitis and 1,138,018 in the general population cohort. 2.2% of the asthma cohort, 3.5% the COPD cohort, 2.4% of the allergic rhinitis cohort and 1.1% of the general population, were identified as having either suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care (approximately a quarter were confirmed). In the asthma cohort, the following were found to be independently significantly associated with having suspected/confirmed COVID-19;older age, being male, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, sleep apnoea, bronchiectasis, COPD, ILD, chronic renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, dementia and liver disease (all p<0.0001). A history of past or current smoking and a high eosinophil count were not significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary findings suggest patients with asthma are more likely to consult primary care about COVID-19 than a matched general population, but less likely than COPD patients, and that type-2 inflammation may not be associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 consultation with a primary care physician. Analysis comparing to the other cohorts and the general population, and using data from secondary care and PHE, is ongoing.","PeriodicalId":375809,"journal":{"name":"TP63. TP063 COVID-19 IN ENVIRONMENTAL, OCCUPATIONAL, AND POPULATION HEALTH","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP63. TP063 COVID-19 IN ENVIRONMENTAL, OCCUPATIONAL, AND POPULATION HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2021.203.1_meetingabstracts.a3077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RATIONALE Several factors may be associated with the apparent reduced risk of severe COVID-19 disease in asthma patients. These include a proposed protective effect from inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or from a type-2 immune airway response. Large UK population cohorts have found conflicting results, but each had missing information on asthma phenotype, including exacerbation history or markers of type-2 inflammation. Protective factors may be determined by comparing the outcomes of asthma patients to other patients using ICS or patients that have similar inflammation. This will be done using a national primary care database linked to secondary care data and Public Health England (PHE) COVID-19 data. METHODS From a primary care database covering around 15% of the UK population, we drew three cohorts of adults (>17 years) with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or allergic rhinitis, and a general population cohort matched by age, gender and primary care practice. COVID-19 infection was defined using three sources: primary care records (confirmed and suspected cases), hospital admissions or PHE data from their surveillance system. Preliminary analysis calculated the proportion of patients diagnosed as suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care between 1st February and 22nd June 2020. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations between risk factors and COVID-19. RESULTS We identified 729,045 patients with asthma, 280,892 with COPD, 137,312 with allergic rhinitis and 1,138,018 in the general population cohort. 2.2% of the asthma cohort, 3.5% the COPD cohort, 2.4% of the allergic rhinitis cohort and 1.1% of the general population, were identified as having either suspected or confirmed COVID-19 in primary care (approximately a quarter were confirmed). In the asthma cohort, the following were found to be independently significantly associated with having suspected/confirmed COVID-19;older age, being male, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, obesity, sleep apnoea, bronchiectasis, COPD, ILD, chronic renal failure, cerebrovascular disease, dementia and liver disease (all p<0.0001). A history of past or current smoking and a high eosinophil count were not significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS These preliminary findings suggest patients with asthma are more likely to consult primary care about COVID-19 than a matched general population, but less likely than COPD patients, and that type-2 inflammation may not be associated with an increased risk of COVID-19 consultation with a primary care physician. Analysis comparing to the other cohorts and the general population, and using data from secondary care and PHE, is ongoing.
评估与哮喘中covid - 19风险相关的因素
几个因素可能与哮喘患者发生严重COVID-19疾病的风险明显降低有关。其中包括吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)或2型气道免疫反应的保护性作用。大型英国人群队列发现了相互矛盾的结果,但每个人都缺少关于哮喘表型的信息,包括恶化史或2型炎症标志物。可以通过比较哮喘患者与其他使用ICS的患者或有类似炎症的患者的结果来确定保护因素。这将使用与二级保健数据和英格兰公共卫生部COVID-19数据相关联的国家初级保健数据库来完成。方法:从覆盖约15%英国人口的初级保健数据库中,我们抽取了3组患有哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)或过敏性鼻炎的成年人(17岁),以及按年龄、性别和初级保健实践匹配的一般人群。COVID-19感染的定义使用三个来源:初级保健记录(确诊和疑似病例)、住院记录或来自其监测系统的公共卫生部门数据。初步分析计算了2020年2月1日至6月22日期间在初级保健中被诊断为疑似或确诊的COVID-19患者的比例。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来评估危险因素与COVID-19之间的关联。结果:我们在普通人群队列中确定了729,045例哮喘患者,280,892例COPD患者,137,312例变应性鼻炎患者和1,138,018例。在初级保健中,2.2%的哮喘组、3.5%的COPD组、2.4%的过敏性鼻炎组和1.1%的普通人群被确定为疑似或确诊COVID-19(约四分之一被确诊)。在哮喘队列中,发现以下因素与疑似/确诊COVID-19独立显著相关:年龄较大、男性、糖尿病、心血管疾病、肥胖、睡眠呼吸暂停、支气管扩张、COPD、ILD、慢性肾衰竭、脑血管疾病、痴呆和肝病(p<均为0.0001)。既往或当前吸烟史与嗜酸性粒细胞计数高无显著相关性。这些初步研究结果表明,哮喘患者比匹配的普通人群更有可能咨询COVID-19的初级保健,但比COPD患者的可能性更低,并且2型炎症可能与向初级保健医生咨询COVID-19的风险增加无关。正在与其他队列和一般人群进行比较分析,并使用来自二级保健和PHE的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信