Cost of Tape versus Disk for Archival Storage

Jeff T. Inman, G. Grider, Hsing-bung Chen
{"title":"Cost of Tape versus Disk for Archival Storage","authors":"Jeff T. Inman, G. Grider, Hsing-bung Chen","doi":"10.1109/CLOUD.2014.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For archiving large datasets in high-performance computing facilities, tape technology has a long history of providing inexpensive capacity. However, as the memory-size of supercomputers continues to grow geometrically, the cost of tape bandwidth is becoming more important. The projected costs for tape-drives, robotics, and maintenance, are creating challenges for tape-based archives. The advent of erasure-coded object storage, driven by the \"cloud storage\" industry, might make it practical to implement archives using disks, or hybrid disk-and-tape systems. We used linear optimization techniques to investigate when and how this transition might best be made, taking into consideration our significant investment in tape technology. Our models introduce a technique to systematically relax constraints on the relationship between tape-capacity and tape-bandwidth, which governs a trade-off between cost and performance. We ran parameter studies that support some preliminary conclusions about paths forward for archive infrastructure at LANL.","PeriodicalId":288542,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2014.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

For archiving large datasets in high-performance computing facilities, tape technology has a long history of providing inexpensive capacity. However, as the memory-size of supercomputers continues to grow geometrically, the cost of tape bandwidth is becoming more important. The projected costs for tape-drives, robotics, and maintenance, are creating challenges for tape-based archives. The advent of erasure-coded object storage, driven by the "cloud storage" industry, might make it practical to implement archives using disks, or hybrid disk-and-tape systems. We used linear optimization techniques to investigate when and how this transition might best be made, taking into consideration our significant investment in tape technology. Our models introduce a technique to systematically relax constraints on the relationship between tape-capacity and tape-bandwidth, which governs a trade-off between cost and performance. We ran parameter studies that support some preliminary conclusions about paths forward for archive infrastructure at LANL.
用于归档存储的磁带与磁盘的成本
为了在高性能计算设施中归档大型数据集,磁带技术在提供廉价容量方面有着悠久的历史。然而,随着超级计算机的内存大小继续呈几何级增长,磁带带宽的成本变得越来越重要。磁带驱动器、机器人和维护的预计成本给基于磁带的归档带来了挑战。由“云存储”行业推动的擦除编码对象存储的出现,可能会使使用磁盘或磁盘和磁带混合系统实现归档变得可行。考虑到我们在胶带技术上的重大投资,我们使用线性优化技术来研究何时以及如何最好地实现这种转变。我们的模型引入了一种技术,系统地放宽了对磁带容量和磁带带宽之间关系的限制,这控制了成本和性能之间的权衡。我们进行了一些参数研究,这些研究支持一些关于LANL存档基础设施前进路径的初步结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信