Algorithms in future capital markets: a survey on AI, ML and associated algorithms in capital markets

A. Koshiyama, Nikan B. Firoozye, P. Treleaven
{"title":"Algorithms in future capital markets: a survey on AI, ML and associated algorithms in capital markets","authors":"A. Koshiyama, Nikan B. Firoozye, P. Treleaven","doi":"10.1145/3383455.3422539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) and associated algorithms in future Capital Markets. New AI algorithms are constantly emerging, with each 'strain' mimicking a new form of human learning, reasoning, knowledge, and decisionmaking. The current main disrupting forms of learning include Deep Learning, Adversarial Learning, Transfer and Meta Learning. Albeit these modes of learning have been in the AI/ML field more than a decade, they now are more applicable due to the availability of data, computing power and infrastructure. These forms of learning have produced new models (e.g., Long Short-Term Memory, Generative Adversarial Networks) and leverage important applications (e.g., Natural Language Processing, Adversarial Examples, Deep Fakes, etc.). These new models and applications will drive changes in future Capital Markets, so it is important to understand their computational strengths and weaknesses. Since ML algorithms effectively self-program and evolve dynamically, financial institutions and regulators are becoming increasingly concerned with ensuring there remains a modicum of human control, focusing on Algorithmic Interpretability/Explainability, Robustness and Legality. For example, the concern is that, in the future, an ecology of trading algorithms across different institutions may 'conspire' and become unintentionally fraudulent (cf. LIBOR) or subject to subversion through compromised datasets (e.g. Microsoft Tay). New and unique forms of systemic risks can emerge, potentially coming from excessive algorithmic complexity. The contribution of this paper is to review AI, ML and associated algorithms, their computational strengths and weaknesses, and discuss their future impact on the Capital Markets.","PeriodicalId":447950,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3383455.3422539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper reviews Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML) and associated algorithms in future Capital Markets. New AI algorithms are constantly emerging, with each 'strain' mimicking a new form of human learning, reasoning, knowledge, and decisionmaking. The current main disrupting forms of learning include Deep Learning, Adversarial Learning, Transfer and Meta Learning. Albeit these modes of learning have been in the AI/ML field more than a decade, they now are more applicable due to the availability of data, computing power and infrastructure. These forms of learning have produced new models (e.g., Long Short-Term Memory, Generative Adversarial Networks) and leverage important applications (e.g., Natural Language Processing, Adversarial Examples, Deep Fakes, etc.). These new models and applications will drive changes in future Capital Markets, so it is important to understand their computational strengths and weaknesses. Since ML algorithms effectively self-program and evolve dynamically, financial institutions and regulators are becoming increasingly concerned with ensuring there remains a modicum of human control, focusing on Algorithmic Interpretability/Explainability, Robustness and Legality. For example, the concern is that, in the future, an ecology of trading algorithms across different institutions may 'conspire' and become unintentionally fraudulent (cf. LIBOR) or subject to subversion through compromised datasets (e.g. Microsoft Tay). New and unique forms of systemic risks can emerge, potentially coming from excessive algorithmic complexity. The contribution of this paper is to review AI, ML and associated algorithms, their computational strengths and weaknesses, and discuss their future impact on the Capital Markets.
未来资本市场中的算法:资本市场中AI、ML及相关算法的调查
本文综述了未来资本市场中的人工智能(AI)、机器学习(ML)和相关算法。新的人工智能算法不断涌现,每种“应变”都模仿了人类学习、推理、知识和决策的新形式。目前主要的颠覆性学习形式包括深度学习、对抗性学习、迁移和元学习。尽管这些学习模式在人工智能/机器学习领域已经存在了十多年,但由于数据、计算能力和基础设施的可用性,它们现在更适用。这些形式的学习产生了新的模型(例如,长短期记忆,生成对抗网络)并利用了重要的应用(例如,自然语言处理,对抗示例,深度伪造等)。这些新模型和应用程序将推动未来资本市场的变化,因此了解它们的计算优势和劣势非常重要。由于机器学习算法有效地自我编程和动态发展,金融机构和监管机构越来越关注确保仍然存在少量的人为控制,重点关注算法的可解释性/可解释性、鲁棒性和合法性。例如,人们担心的是,在未来,不同机构之间的交易算法生态可能会“合谋”,并无意中成为欺诈行为(如LIBOR),或者通过受损的数据集(如微软Tay)受到颠覆。新的、独特的系统性风险形式可能会出现,它们可能来自算法的过度复杂性。本文的贡献是回顾人工智能、机器学习和相关算法,它们的计算优势和弱点,并讨论它们对资本市场的未来影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信