The Particularities of Compositional Work in Ernst Krenek’s “Sechs Vermessene”: Interconnection between Serialism and Aleatory Technique

E. Okuneva
{"title":"The Particularities of Compositional Work in Ernst Krenek’s “Sechs Vermessene”: Interconnection between Serialism and Aleatory Technique","authors":"E. Okuneva","doi":"10.17674/1997-0854.2019.2.017-028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ernst Krenek happily accepted the ideas of integral serialism in the 1950s testing them in their musical practice (“Spiritus Intelligentiae, Sanctus” орus 152, “Sestina” орus 161, “Sechs Vermessene” орus 168, “Quaestio temporis” opus 170). The peak of this interest on his part concurred with the period when total serial determinacy experienced a crisis, and contemporary composers directed their attention to the opposite musical pole – the aleatory technique. Krenek’s theoretical elaborations on the issue of serialism, as well as on the interactions between the predetermined and the random elements found their reflection in the article “Extents and Limits of Serial Techniques” (1960). The resulting musical manifestation of these thoughts was the piano cycle “Sechs Vermessene” орus 168 (1958), the title of which imprinted the untranslatable pun of two conceptions: the German word “vermessen” can be translated simultaneously as “measured” and “self-willed.” The serial expansion in this composition encompasses the spheres of pitch and rhythm, as well as density, intensity and register. The article analyzes in detail the first four pieces of the cycle. The author draws parallels with the compositional procedures of Milton Babbitt (the method of registral delamination), Pierre Boulez (the counterpoint of parameters), Olivier Messiaen (the technique of symmetrical permutations) and John Cage (the method of random actions), reconstructs the pre-compositional sound material of the fourth piece, and demonstrates the mistakes and inaccuracies arising upon the realization of the serial schemes in the piece. The analysis reveals the close interconnection between the determined and undetermined elements in the compositional process of the “Sechs Vermessene.” For example, the mathematical computations carried out by the composer for the precise fixation of rhythm leads to the necessity of making use of a new means of notation (wavelike stems), which in the end reflects the precise meanings only approximately. Study of Krenek’s piano cycle, as well as of the composer’s theoretical works, makes it possible to reevaluate the traditional correlation of serialism with the aleatory technique. The transition to composition using the method of random actions must not be considered a reaction to total determinacy; moreover, these methods must not be presented as being opposed to each other. The aleatory technique is, in essence, a natural and inevitable consequence of serialism. Keywords: Ernst Krenek, “Sechs Vermessene,” Pierre Boulez, John Cage, Olivier Messiaen, Milton Babbitt, serial music, serialism, aleatory technique.","PeriodicalId":171243,"journal":{"name":"Music Scholarship / Problemy Muzykal'noj Nauki","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Scholarship / Problemy Muzykal'noj Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17674/1997-0854.2019.2.017-028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ernst Krenek happily accepted the ideas of integral serialism in the 1950s testing them in their musical practice (“Spiritus Intelligentiae, Sanctus” орus 152, “Sestina” орus 161, “Sechs Vermessene” орus 168, “Quaestio temporis” opus 170). The peak of this interest on his part concurred with the period when total serial determinacy experienced a crisis, and contemporary composers directed their attention to the opposite musical pole – the aleatory technique. Krenek’s theoretical elaborations on the issue of serialism, as well as on the interactions between the predetermined and the random elements found their reflection in the article “Extents and Limits of Serial Techniques” (1960). The resulting musical manifestation of these thoughts was the piano cycle “Sechs Vermessene” орus 168 (1958), the title of which imprinted the untranslatable pun of two conceptions: the German word “vermessen” can be translated simultaneously as “measured” and “self-willed.” The serial expansion in this composition encompasses the spheres of pitch and rhythm, as well as density, intensity and register. The article analyzes in detail the first four pieces of the cycle. The author draws parallels with the compositional procedures of Milton Babbitt (the method of registral delamination), Pierre Boulez (the counterpoint of parameters), Olivier Messiaen (the technique of symmetrical permutations) and John Cage (the method of random actions), reconstructs the pre-compositional sound material of the fourth piece, and demonstrates the mistakes and inaccuracies arising upon the realization of the serial schemes in the piece. The analysis reveals the close interconnection between the determined and undetermined elements in the compositional process of the “Sechs Vermessene.” For example, the mathematical computations carried out by the composer for the precise fixation of rhythm leads to the necessity of making use of a new means of notation (wavelike stems), which in the end reflects the precise meanings only approximately. Study of Krenek’s piano cycle, as well as of the composer’s theoretical works, makes it possible to reevaluate the traditional correlation of serialism with the aleatory technique. The transition to composition using the method of random actions must not be considered a reaction to total determinacy; moreover, these methods must not be presented as being opposed to each other. The aleatory technique is, in essence, a natural and inevitable consequence of serialism. Keywords: Ernst Krenek, “Sechs Vermessene,” Pierre Boulez, John Cage, Olivier Messiaen, Milton Babbitt, serial music, serialism, aleatory technique.
恩斯特·克列内克作品《真实》的构图特殊性:序列主义与修饰技术的相互联系
恩斯特·克雷内克在20世纪50年代愉快地接受了整体序列主义的思想,并在他们的音乐实践中进行了测试(“精神智慧”,“Sanctus”152,“Sestina”161,“Sechs Vermessene”168,“Quaestio temporis”170)。对他来说,这种兴趣的顶峰与总序列确定性经历危机的时期一致,当代作曲家将他们的注意力转向了相反的音乐极点-修饰技术。Krenek对序列主义问题的理论阐述,以及对预定元素和随机元素之间相互作用的理论阐述,在《序列技术的范围和极限》(1960)一文中得到了体现。这些想法的音乐表现是钢琴循环“Sechs Vermessene”(1958),它的标题印着两个概念的不可翻译的双关语:德语单词“vermessen”可以同时翻译为“测量”和“任性”。这首乐曲的连续扩展包括音高和节奏,以及密度、强度和音域。本文详细分析了该循环的前四部分。作者对比了米尔顿·巴比特(音阶分层法)、皮埃尔·布列兹(参数对位法)、奥利维耶·梅西安(对称排列法)和约翰·凯奇(随机行动法)的作曲过程,重构了第四首作品的作曲前声音材料,并论证了在作品中序列方案实现过程中出现的错误和不准确。通过分析,揭示了在“石竹”的组成过程中,确定元素和未确定元素之间的密切联系。例如,作曲家为了精确地固定节奏而进行的数学计算导致了使用一种新的记谱方法(波状茎)的必要性,这种记谱方法最终只能近似地反映精确的含义。研究克列尼克的钢琴循环,以及作曲家的理论作品,可以重新评估序列主义与随意技术的传统关系。过渡到使用随机作用方法的组合不应被认为是对完全确定性的反应;此外,这些方法不能被认为是相互对立的。从本质上讲,变异技术是序列主义的自然和不可避免的结果。关键词:恩斯特·克列克,《塞克斯·维梅塞内》,皮埃尔·布列兹,约翰·凯奇,奥利维尔·梅西安,米尔顿·巴比特,系列音乐,系列主义,创作技巧
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信