Sexual Assault Disclosure by College Women at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly White Institutions

Jane E. Palmer, Noelle M. St. Vil
{"title":"Sexual Assault Disclosure by College Women at Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Predominantly White Institutions","authors":"Jane E. Palmer, Noelle M. St. Vil","doi":"10.1080/19407882.2017.1367696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the Title IX law, administrators at institutions of higher education (IHE) in the United States must promptly investigate reports of sexual assault. In addition, the Clery Act requires IHEs to publicly disclose annual sexual assault statistics. However, it is unknown whether—or how—sexual assault disclosure differs by type of IHE. This study, a secondary analysis of data collected from students at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and predominantly White institutions (PWIs), examines the role of incident, offender, and victim characteristics in whether women disclosed experiencing unwanted sexual contact (due to force or incapacitation) and to whom they disclosed, by type of IHE. Significant differences in the characteristics of their experiences and factors associated with sexual assault disclosure were found between samples of women attending HBCUs (n = 327) and PWIs (n = 760). However, as expected, the multivariate analyses indicate that factors associated with the culturally reinforced stereotype of “real rape”—that is, the use of force, presence of injuries, and perpetrators who were not an intimate partner, friend, or acquaintance—were positively associated with disclosure for both samples. Overall, the probability of disclosure was higher for sexual assault due to force than incapacitation. In addition, White students had a higher probability of disclosure than Black students for both forms of sexual assault regardless of type of IHE.","PeriodicalId":310518,"journal":{"name":"NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19407882.2017.1367696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Due to the Title IX law, administrators at institutions of higher education (IHE) in the United States must promptly investigate reports of sexual assault. In addition, the Clery Act requires IHEs to publicly disclose annual sexual assault statistics. However, it is unknown whether—or how—sexual assault disclosure differs by type of IHE. This study, a secondary analysis of data collected from students at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) and predominantly White institutions (PWIs), examines the role of incident, offender, and victim characteristics in whether women disclosed experiencing unwanted sexual contact (due to force or incapacitation) and to whom they disclosed, by type of IHE. Significant differences in the characteristics of their experiences and factors associated with sexual assault disclosure were found between samples of women attending HBCUs (n = 327) and PWIs (n = 760). However, as expected, the multivariate analyses indicate that factors associated with the culturally reinforced stereotype of “real rape”—that is, the use of force, presence of injuries, and perpetrators who were not an intimate partner, friend, or acquaintance—were positively associated with disclosure for both samples. Overall, the probability of disclosure was higher for sexual assault due to force than incapacitation. In addition, White students had a higher probability of disclosure than Black students for both forms of sexual assault regardless of type of IHE.
历史上黑人大学和白人占主导地位的机构中女大学生的性侵犯披露
根据第九条法律,美国高等教育机构(IHE)的管理人员必须立即调查性侵犯报告。此外,克莱利法案要求高等教育机构公开披露年度性侵犯统计数据。然而,目前尚不清楚性侵犯的披露是否或如何因IHE类型而不同。本研究对从传统黑人学院和大学(HBCUs)和以白人为主的机构(pwi)收集的数据进行了二次分析,研究了事件、罪犯和受害者特征在女性是否透露经历过不受欢迎的性接触(由于强迫或丧失行为能力)以及她们向谁透露的IHE类型中的作用。在HBCUs (n = 327)和PWIs (n = 760)的女性样本中,她们的经历特征和与性侵犯披露相关的因素存在显著差异。然而,正如预期的那样,多变量分析表明,与文化上强化的“真正的强奸”刻板印象相关的因素——即使用武力、伤口的存在,以及肇事者不是亲密的伴侣、朋友或熟人——在两个样本中都与披露呈正相关。总体而言,由于暴力导致的性侵犯比丧失行为能力导致的性侵犯披露的可能性更高。此外,白人学生比黑人学生对两种形式的性侵犯披露的可能性更高,而与IHE类型无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信