Analysis and comparison of improved artificial potential field method and A* in complex obstacle environment

Jiading Yang
{"title":"Analysis and comparison of improved artificial potential field method and A* in complex obstacle environment","authors":"Jiading Yang","doi":"10.1145/3529466.3529490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to improve the efficiency of the mobile robot and select a better path planning algorithm suitable for obstacle scenes, the artificial potential field method ( APF ) based on the annealing algorithm and A* algorithm are compared under different obstacles. The two algorithms are simulated in three different complexity scenarios. The results show that the two algorithms perform well in the narrow channel at the target point, in the single model with fewer obstacles, the artificial potential field method has fewer corners and shorter paths. For L-shaped and hill-shaped complex scenes, A* can accurately find shorter paths, and the artificial potential field method is prone to fall into local traps, however, the relatively simple obstacles can be handled by the annealing algorithm.","PeriodicalId":375562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 6th International Conference on Innovation in Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3529466.3529490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to improve the efficiency of the mobile robot and select a better path planning algorithm suitable for obstacle scenes, the artificial potential field method ( APF ) based on the annealing algorithm and A* algorithm are compared under different obstacles. The two algorithms are simulated in three different complexity scenarios. The results show that the two algorithms perform well in the narrow channel at the target point, in the single model with fewer obstacles, the artificial potential field method has fewer corners and shorter paths. For L-shaped and hill-shaped complex scenes, A* can accurately find shorter paths, and the artificial potential field method is prone to fall into local traps, however, the relatively simple obstacles can be handled by the annealing algorithm.
复杂障碍环境下改进人工势场法与A*法的分析比较
为了提高移动机器人的效率,选择更适合障碍物场景的路径规划算法,对不同障碍物下基于退火算法的人工势场法(APF)和a *算法进行了比较。在三种不同的复杂场景下对这两种算法进行了仿真。结果表明,两种算法在目标点处的狭窄通道中表现良好,在障碍物较少的单一模型中,人工势场法的角点较少,路径较短。对于l形和小山形的复杂场景,A*可以准确地找到较短的路径,人工势场法容易陷入局部陷阱,而相对简单的障碍物可以通过退火算法处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信