University Pathways of Graduate Students: Professionalization, Innovation and Identity. A French-Argentine Comparative Study

M. Aparicio
{"title":"University Pathways of Graduate Students: Professionalization, Innovation and Identity. A French-Argentine Comparative Study","authors":"M. Aparicio","doi":"10.26417/665nnr29t","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents findings from two studies carried out with fourth level university students in Argentina, namely Argentine PhDs working at UNCuyo, and with a second group made up of PhDs who are taking part in Professionalization programs (Programs of International Cooperation) in France. This is a comparative study. It is thought that after showing a certain level of excellence and being in contact with other cultures, differences between the groups may exist in terms of perspectives for future work, the role of innovation and competencies to be developed. Various hypotheses were considered. Both studies included common variables related to issues that affect, on the one hand, the effectivity and quality of the University as it relates to the working world and, on the other hand, personal and professional pathways. We focused on Professionalization, Identity and Innovation, variables that involve individuals and contexts interacting with one another. The methodology was quanti-qualitative. Techniques used were semi-structured surveys, interviews and focus groups. The findings show convergences, divergences and silences in the different groups with respect to Innovation, both in its conception and roots and with respect to the future world of work (effects). The findings renew interest in education and employment policies in the face of the demands and changes that the future workplace will require.","PeriodicalId":432313,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Science Education and Research","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Science Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26417/665nnr29t","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article presents findings from two studies carried out with fourth level university students in Argentina, namely Argentine PhDs working at UNCuyo, and with a second group made up of PhDs who are taking part in Professionalization programs (Programs of International Cooperation) in France. This is a comparative study. It is thought that after showing a certain level of excellence and being in contact with other cultures, differences between the groups may exist in terms of perspectives for future work, the role of innovation and competencies to be developed. Various hypotheses were considered. Both studies included common variables related to issues that affect, on the one hand, the effectivity and quality of the University as it relates to the working world and, on the other hand, personal and professional pathways. We focused on Professionalization, Identity and Innovation, variables that involve individuals and contexts interacting with one another. The methodology was quanti-qualitative. Techniques used were semi-structured surveys, interviews and focus groups. The findings show convergences, divergences and silences in the different groups with respect to Innovation, both in its conception and roots and with respect to the future world of work (effects). The findings renew interest in education and employment policies in the face of the demands and changes that the future workplace will require.
研究生的大学之路:专业化、创新与认同。法国-阿根廷比较研究
本文介绍了两项研究的结果,研究对象是阿根廷的四级大学生,即在UNCuyo工作的阿根廷博士,以及在法国参加专业化项目(国际合作项目)的第二组博士。这是一项比较研究。人们认为,在表现出一定程度的卓越和与其他文化接触之后,在对未来工作的看法、创新的作用和有待发展的能力方面,群体之间可能存在差异。考虑了各种假设。这两项研究都包括了一些共同的变量,这些变量一方面影响到大学与工作世界相关的效率和质量,另一方面影响到个人和职业道路。我们专注于专业化,身份和创新,涉及个人和环境相互作用的变量。方法是定量定性的。使用的技术是半结构化调查、访谈和焦点小组。调查结果显示,在创新的概念和根源以及未来工作领域(影响)方面,不同群体有趋同、分歧和沉默。面对未来职场的需求和变化,研究结果重新唤起了人们对教育和就业政策的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信