{"title":"Wellhead Growth Evaluation and Analysis with Stiffness Method; an Onshore Gas Well Case Study","authors":"G. R. Darmawan","doi":"10.25105/PETRO.V9I3.7740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the challenges in designing a production or an injector well is the potential of wellhead growth primarily because of casings thermal stress that are connected to the wellhead. Well integrity issue could occur if this movement was not addressed correctly. Casing thermal stress was created by temperature change in production or injection gas or fluids. That temperature change induces uncontrolled heat transfer from tubing to the casing strings in form of casing thermal stress.One of gas field in Indonesia was producing gas with formation water. One well was showing significant wellhead growth during production. The hazard noticed was the stiffness of the surface flowline equipment, as the wellhead moving upward, but the flowline is not free to move. The flange connection between the Christmases tree manifold to the flowline was the weak point, causing the well has to be shut in for further investigations.Well constructions data collection continued with analysis was performed with stiffness method in multistring well thermal growth model as explained and developed by Q. Jim Liang[1] to calculate casing thermal stress and wellhead growth. Thermal growth is sensitive to the length of free moving casing sections, as the heat transfer laterally to the casing strings. This paper will evaluate and analyze the cause of wellhead growth on gas production well with stiffness method in multistring casing, and estimating the cement column height on the casings that might cause the measured movement. A sensitivity of top of cements intermediate and production casing and how it affects the wellhead growth and thermal force. And also comparison forces between annulus pressure and temperature will also discussed in this paper.","PeriodicalId":435945,"journal":{"name":"PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PETRO:Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25105/PETRO.V9I3.7740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the challenges in designing a production or an injector well is the potential of wellhead growth primarily because of casings thermal stress that are connected to the wellhead. Well integrity issue could occur if this movement was not addressed correctly. Casing thermal stress was created by temperature change in production or injection gas or fluids. That temperature change induces uncontrolled heat transfer from tubing to the casing strings in form of casing thermal stress.One of gas field in Indonesia was producing gas with formation water. One well was showing significant wellhead growth during production. The hazard noticed was the stiffness of the surface flowline equipment, as the wellhead moving upward, but the flowline is not free to move. The flange connection between the Christmases tree manifold to the flowline was the weak point, causing the well has to be shut in for further investigations.Well constructions data collection continued with analysis was performed with stiffness method in multistring well thermal growth model as explained and developed by Q. Jim Liang[1] to calculate casing thermal stress and wellhead growth. Thermal growth is sensitive to the length of free moving casing sections, as the heat transfer laterally to the casing strings. This paper will evaluate and analyze the cause of wellhead growth on gas production well with stiffness method in multistring casing, and estimating the cement column height on the casings that might cause the measured movement. A sensitivity of top of cements intermediate and production casing and how it affects the wellhead growth and thermal force. And also comparison forces between annulus pressure and temperature will also discussed in this paper.
设计生产井或注入井的挑战之一是井口的潜在增长,主要是由于与井口相连的套管热应力。如果没有正确处理这种移动,可能会出现井的完整性问题。套管热应力是由于生产或注入气体或流体的温度变化而产生的。这种温度变化以套管热应力的形式从油管向套管柱不受控制地传递热量。印度尼西亚的一个天然气田利用地层水生产天然气。其中一口井在生产过程中井口出现了明显的增长。注意到的危险是,当井口向上移动时,地面管线设备的刚度,但管线不能自由移动。采油树管汇与管线之间的法兰连接是薄弱环节,导致井必须关井进行进一步调查。Q. Jim Liang[1]解释并开发了多管柱井热增长模型,采用刚度法计算套管热应力和井口增长,继续进行井结构数据收集和分析。热生长对自由移动套管段的长度很敏感,因为热量横向传递到套管柱。本文将采用刚度法评价和分析多管柱套管井产气井井口生长的原因,并对可能引起被测井口移动的套管上水泥柱高度进行估算。水泥中间体和生产套管顶部的敏感性及其对井口生长和热压力的影响。文中还讨论了环空压力与温度的作用力对比。