A Quantitative Model for the Assessment of Ethics Risks in Information Technology

Giulia Rafaiani, Giorgia Barchiesi, Ludovica Ilari, Marco Baldi, B. Giovanola
{"title":"A Quantitative Model for the Assessment of Ethics Risks in Information Technology","authors":"Giulia Rafaiani, Giorgia Barchiesi, Ludovica Ilari, Marco Baldi, B. Giovanola","doi":"10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10155002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of sensitive and personal data in the healthcare sector must guarantee the widest respect of patients' fundamental rights. However, some quantitative evaluation framework for assessing the level of ethical compliance of a technology to the most important ethical principles is still missing. In this work, we first provide a model to quantitatively assess constitutive ethics, i.e., the intrinsic ethical compliance of a technology. Secondly, we propose a method for quantitatively assessing circumstantial ethics risks of a technology, when used in some specific context. Our ethics risk assessment model is based on the evaluation of the compliance of the technology to a defined set of controls about some ethical principles and about the robustness of the technological infrastructure underneath. Then, we validate our model by applying it to some recent healthrelated blockchain frameworks, and we compare a qualitative ethical assessment with the quantitative assessment made with the proposed model for constitutive ethics compliance. Through our assessment, we identify some technical choices that achieve the highest ethical scores, such as using a permissioned blockchain, off-chain storage, and encryption of data. Finally, we observe that the principles of privacy and data governance turn out to be the most satisfied ethical principles, contrary to fairness.","PeriodicalId":203527,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ETHICS57328.2023.10155002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of sensitive and personal data in the healthcare sector must guarantee the widest respect of patients' fundamental rights. However, some quantitative evaluation framework for assessing the level of ethical compliance of a technology to the most important ethical principles is still missing. In this work, we first provide a model to quantitatively assess constitutive ethics, i.e., the intrinsic ethical compliance of a technology. Secondly, we propose a method for quantitatively assessing circumstantial ethics risks of a technology, when used in some specific context. Our ethics risk assessment model is based on the evaluation of the compliance of the technology to a defined set of controls about some ethical principles and about the robustness of the technological infrastructure underneath. Then, we validate our model by applying it to some recent healthrelated blockchain frameworks, and we compare a qualitative ethical assessment with the quantitative assessment made with the proposed model for constitutive ethics compliance. Through our assessment, we identify some technical choices that achieve the highest ethical scores, such as using a permissioned blockchain, off-chain storage, and encryption of data. Finally, we observe that the principles of privacy and data governance turn out to be the most satisfied ethical principles, contrary to fairness.
信息技术伦理风险评估的定量模型
医疗保健部门敏感和个人数据的管理必须保证最广泛地尊重患者的基本权利。然而,一些定量的评估框架,以评估一项技术对最重要的道德原则的道德遵从程度,仍然是缺失的。在这项工作中,我们首先提供了一个模型来定量评估本构伦理,即技术的内在伦理合规性。其次,我们提出了一种定量评估技术在某些特定背景下使用时的间接伦理风险的方法。我们的道德风险评估模型是基于评估技术是否符合一组定义的控制,这些控制涉及一些道德原则和底层技术基础设施的稳健性。然后,我们通过将模型应用于一些最近与健康相关的区块链框架来验证我们的模型,并将定性道德评估与拟议的构成道德合规性模型进行的定量评估进行比较。通过我们的评估,我们确定了一些达到最高道德分数的技术选择,例如使用许可的区块链、链下存储和数据加密。最后,我们观察到隐私和数据治理原则是最令人满意的道德原则,与公平相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信