THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS OF ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED REPORTING OF AGRICULTURAL CORPORATIONS: HUMAN CAPITAL

R. Kostyrko, Denys Prozorov
{"title":"THEORETICAL AND APPLIED ASPECTS OF ANALYSIS OF INTEGRATED REPORTING OF AGRICULTURAL CORPORATIONS: HUMAN CAPITAL","authors":"R. Kostyrko, Denys Prozorov","doi":"10.30525/2661-5169/2021-2-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the paper is to improve scientific and applied aspects of analysis of integrated reporting of agricultural corporations on the example of human capital indicators. Methodology. Theoretical aspects of the study are based on the international standards of the Global Reporting Initiative and AccountAbility. Applied aspects are the generalization and critical evaluation of the form, content, quantitative and qualitative indicators of integrated reporting of agricultural corporations. The results of the paper are to define non-financial reporting as an integrated format of information on natural, industrial, financial, human, intellectual, social, institutional capital of enterprises. It is shown that the development of the system of formation and presentation of integrated reporting is influenced by two trends that are somewhat mutually exclusive: firstly, supranational regulation by GRI and AA1000 standards; secondly, the voluntary nature and predominance of content over form, which cause significant differences in formats and the difficulty of conducting a comparative analysis of reporting enterprises. It is proved that integrated reporting is a comprehensive set of quantitative and qualitative indicators, which are divided into general, common to all enterprises of the national economy, and specific, inherent in certain types of economic activity. For agricultural corporations, the latter are: protection of agricultural lands, animal well-being, state and directions of development of organic production, etc. The components of integrated reporting of four agricultural corporations of Ukraine are summarized. Their similarity is determined by the substantive characteristics associated with the disclosure of information about the impact of the enterprise on the environment, social and economic impact, corporate governance, animal well-being. The differences are related to the form of presentation of information, the number of sections of integrated reporting. The conceptual basis of human capital management and features of program in separate researched agrarian corporations are generalized. The analysis of human capital as an object of integrated reporting of agricultural corporations on the indicators of the total number of staff, its permanent and seasonal part, gender composition, categories of employees, age, and duration of training has been performed. Practical implications are the development of recommendations aimed at eliminating the shortcomings of the disclosure of information about human capital associated with the prevalence of quantitative indicators over qualitative ones. It is proposed to use indicators of labor productivity, average wages compared to the industry level, as well as motivational mechanisms for staff in the form of corporate health insurance. Value/originality. The necessity of data integration is substantiated not only at the level of the non-financial report, but also at the level of separate sections, which is advisable to be represented by separate types of capital. On the example of the section “Human capital” it is recommended to highlight the units related to its economic, social, cultural, intellectual development, etc. in its composition.","PeriodicalId":185837,"journal":{"name":"Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal","volume":"74 10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green, Blue & Digital Economy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30525/2661-5169/2021-2-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to improve scientific and applied aspects of analysis of integrated reporting of agricultural corporations on the example of human capital indicators. Methodology. Theoretical aspects of the study are based on the international standards of the Global Reporting Initiative and AccountAbility. Applied aspects are the generalization and critical evaluation of the form, content, quantitative and qualitative indicators of integrated reporting of agricultural corporations. The results of the paper are to define non-financial reporting as an integrated format of information on natural, industrial, financial, human, intellectual, social, institutional capital of enterprises. It is shown that the development of the system of formation and presentation of integrated reporting is influenced by two trends that are somewhat mutually exclusive: firstly, supranational regulation by GRI and AA1000 standards; secondly, the voluntary nature and predominance of content over form, which cause significant differences in formats and the difficulty of conducting a comparative analysis of reporting enterprises. It is proved that integrated reporting is a comprehensive set of quantitative and qualitative indicators, which are divided into general, common to all enterprises of the national economy, and specific, inherent in certain types of economic activity. For agricultural corporations, the latter are: protection of agricultural lands, animal well-being, state and directions of development of organic production, etc. The components of integrated reporting of four agricultural corporations of Ukraine are summarized. Their similarity is determined by the substantive characteristics associated with the disclosure of information about the impact of the enterprise on the environment, social and economic impact, corporate governance, animal well-being. The differences are related to the form of presentation of information, the number of sections of integrated reporting. The conceptual basis of human capital management and features of program in separate researched agrarian corporations are generalized. The analysis of human capital as an object of integrated reporting of agricultural corporations on the indicators of the total number of staff, its permanent and seasonal part, gender composition, categories of employees, age, and duration of training has been performed. Practical implications are the development of recommendations aimed at eliminating the shortcomings of the disclosure of information about human capital associated with the prevalence of quantitative indicators over qualitative ones. It is proposed to use indicators of labor productivity, average wages compared to the industry level, as well as motivational mechanisms for staff in the form of corporate health insurance. Value/originality. The necessity of data integration is substantiated not only at the level of the non-financial report, but also at the level of separate sections, which is advisable to be represented by separate types of capital. On the example of the section “Human capital” it is recommended to highlight the units related to its economic, social, cultural, intellectual development, etc. in its composition.
农业企业综合报告的理论与应用分析:人力资本
本文旨在以人力资本指标为例,提高农业企业综合报告分析的科学性和应用性。方法。该研究的理论方面是基于全球报告倡议和问责制的国际标准。应用方面是对农业企业综合报告的形式、内容、定量和定性指标的概括和批判性评价。本文将非财务报告定义为企业自然资本、产业资本、财务资本、人力资本、智力资本、社会资本和制度资本等信息的综合形式。研究表明,综合报告的形成和呈现体系的发展受到两种趋势的影响,这两种趋势在某种程度上是相互排斥的:第一,GRI和AA1000标准的超国家监管;其次,内容对形式的自愿性和主导性,导致报告企业在格式上存在显著差异,难以进行比较分析。事实证明,综合报告是一套综合的定量和定性指标,这些指标分为一般性指标和特殊性指标,前者是国民经济中所有企业所共有的,后者是某些类型经济活动所固有的。对农业企业来说,后者包括:农业用地保护、动物福利、有机生产的状态和发展方向等。总结了乌克兰四家农业公司综合报告的组成部分。它们的相似性是由企业对环境的影响、社会和经济影响、公司治理、动物福利等信息披露的实质性特征所决定的。这些差异与信息的列报形式、综合报告的节数有关。概述了人力资本管理的概念基础和在个别研究的农业企业中人力资本管理方案的特点。人力资本作为农业公司综合报告的对象,分析了工作人员总数、长期和季节性部分、性别构成、雇员类别、年龄和培训时间等指标。实际影响是拟订建议,以消除在公布人力资本资料方面由于数量指标普遍高于质量指标而存在的缺点。建议使用劳动生产率指标、与行业水平相比的平均工资以及以企业健康保险形式对员工的激励机制。价值/创意。数据整合的必要性不仅在非财务报告层面得到证实,而且在单独的章节层面得到证实,建议用单独的资本类型来表示。以“人力资本”一节为例,建议在其构成中突出与经济、社会、文化、智力发展等相关的单元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信