Evaluation approaches to empowering interventions

Ildikó Vojtek
{"title":"Evaluation approaches to empowering interventions","authors":"Ildikó Vojtek","doi":"10.15170/socrev.2021.14.01.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empowerment has been a widespread term since the 1990s and is common in contexts as social work, community development, psychology, medicine, and several other areas of human development and health. Empowerment is a process during which a person, an organization, or a community is enabled to identify themselves, to recognize their own power positions and to improve their unequal social situations (Varga, 2017). The evaluation of empowerment outcomes has been missing from the Hungarian professional literature.  This review article focuses on the empowerment of adults through educational theatre and drama, and is based on the analysis of previous research results in the area. \nEmpowerment is a multi-level, context-dependent construct, hence, evaluating empowerment outcomes is challenging. Theorists of empowerment warn against creating a general instrument for measurement (Zimmerman, 1995). I reflect on quantitative, qualitative, and combined evaluation methods, such as the Psychological Empowerment Scale (Akey et al., 2000), the Empowerment Evaluation (Fetterman, 2001), and the Empowerment Measuring Tool (Jupp et al., 2010), also taking Wandersman and associates’ (2005) principles for empowerment evaluation into account.","PeriodicalId":211764,"journal":{"name":"Szociális Szemle","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Szociális Szemle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15170/socrev.2021.14.01.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empowerment has been a widespread term since the 1990s and is common in contexts as social work, community development, psychology, medicine, and several other areas of human development and health. Empowerment is a process during which a person, an organization, or a community is enabled to identify themselves, to recognize their own power positions and to improve their unequal social situations (Varga, 2017). The evaluation of empowerment outcomes has been missing from the Hungarian professional literature.  This review article focuses on the empowerment of adults through educational theatre and drama, and is based on the analysis of previous research results in the area. Empowerment is a multi-level, context-dependent construct, hence, evaluating empowerment outcomes is challenging. Theorists of empowerment warn against creating a general instrument for measurement (Zimmerman, 1995). I reflect on quantitative, qualitative, and combined evaluation methods, such as the Psychological Empowerment Scale (Akey et al., 2000), the Empowerment Evaluation (Fetterman, 2001), and the Empowerment Measuring Tool (Jupp et al., 2010), also taking Wandersman and associates’ (2005) principles for empowerment evaluation into account.
授权干预措施的评估方法
自20世纪90年代以来,赋权一直是一个广泛使用的术语,在社会工作、社区发展、心理学、医学以及人类发展和健康的其他几个领域都很常见。赋权是一个过程,在这个过程中,一个人、一个组织或一个社区能够识别自己,认识到自己的权力地位,并改善他们不平等的社会状况(Varga, 2017)。匈牙利的专业文献中一直缺少对赋权结果的评估。这篇综述文章的重点是通过教育戏剧和戏剧赋予成年人权力,并基于对该领域先前研究成果的分析。授权是一个多层次的、依赖于上下文的结构,因此,评估授权结果是具有挑战性的。授权理论家警告不要创造一种通用的测量工具(齐默尔曼,1995)。我反思了定量、定性和综合评估方法,如心理授权量表(Akey等人,2000)、授权评估(Fetterman, 2001)和授权测量工具(Jupp等人,2010),也考虑了Wandersman和同事(2005)的授权评估原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信