A Substantiation of the Historicity of Jesus in Antonio Socci’s Apology: A Presentation and Critique

Przemysław Artemiuk
{"title":"A Substantiation of the Historicity of Jesus in Antonio Socci’s Apology: A Presentation and Critique","authors":"Przemysław Artemiuk","doi":"10.15290/rtk.2020.19.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, the author presents and critiques of Antonio Socci’s substantiations for the historicity of Jesus. This Italian apologist is a writer, journalist, and Catholic publicist is known for his controversial theses. By taking up a defense of Jesus, and thereby Christianity itself, Antonio Socci seeks first to unmask the lies that underpin the foundations of antichristian ideology and then demonstrate the credibility of the events described in the Gospel by referring to archeological and historical studies. As he himself admits, Socci’s publications are not the works of an expert, exegete, papyrologist, or historian, but rather the fruit of his journalistic investigations that takes the form of an apology. The author of this article reconstructs Socci’s defense of Jesus and then critiques his most controversial theories. He then proceeds to formulate conclusions based on this research.","PeriodicalId":346997,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15290/rtk.2020.19.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, the author presents and critiques of Antonio Socci’s substantiations for the historicity of Jesus. This Italian apologist is a writer, journalist, and Catholic publicist is known for his controversial theses. By taking up a defense of Jesus, and thereby Christianity itself, Antonio Socci seeks first to unmask the lies that underpin the foundations of antichristian ideology and then demonstrate the credibility of the events described in the Gospel by referring to archeological and historical studies. As he himself admits, Socci’s publications are not the works of an expert, exegete, papyrologist, or historian, but rather the fruit of his journalistic investigations that takes the form of an apology. The author of this article reconstructs Socci’s defense of Jesus and then critiques his most controversial theories. He then proceeds to formulate conclusions based on this research.
安东尼奥·索契《道歉》中耶稣历史性的实证:呈现与批判
在这篇文章中,作者提出并批评安东尼奥·索契的证据,耶稣的历史性。这位意大利护教家是一位作家、记者和天主教公关人员,以其有争议的论点而闻名。通过为耶稣辩护,从而为基督教本身辩护,安东尼奥·索奇首先试图揭开支撑反基督教意识形态基础的谎言,然后通过参考考古和历史研究来证明福音书中描述的事件的可信度。正如他自己承认的那样,Socci的出版物不是专家、注释家、纸草学家或历史学家的作品,而是他以道歉的形式进行新闻调查的成果。本文的作者重建了Socci对耶稣的辩护,然后批评了他最具争议的理论。然后,他根据这项研究得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信