Comparison of Various Methods of Detection of Hypoxemia and Correlation of Hypoxemia with Clinical Features among Pediatric Patients 3 Months to 5 Years Old with Community-Acquired Pneumonia at a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Room
{"title":"Comparison of Various Methods of Detection of Hypoxemia and Correlation of Hypoxemia with Clinical Features among Pediatric Patients 3 Months to 5 Years Old with Community-Acquired Pneumonia at a Tertiary Hospital Emergency Room","authors":"Francesca Mae T. Pantig, S. Gatchalian","doi":"10.56964/pidspj20192001005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pulse oximetry is frequently utilized as a rapid, non-invasive, point-of-care alternative to arterial blood gas analysis in measuring oxygen saturation of children with pneumonia. Objectives: To compare portable fingertip pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2PF), handheld pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2H) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in detection of hypoxemia, and correlate hypoxemia with clinical features in children with pneumonia. Methodology: This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study involving patients 3 months to 5 years old with pneumonia. Oxygen saturation was measured using a portable fingertip pulse oximeter, a handheld pulse oximeter, and arterial blood gas analysis. Results: Eighty-six children were included. SpO2 PF underestimated oxygen levels by 0.126% (95% CI -0.240 to 0.491), while SpO2H underestimated it by 0.323% (95% CI -0.075 to 0.721). Between portable and handheld readings, the mean difference was 0.198% (95% CI -0.089 to 0.484). Across the three methods, limits of agreement ranged from -3.388 to +4.035%. There was no statistically significant difference in variance among the three measurements. Children with tachypnea (cOR 2.623, 95% CI 1.06 – 6.48, p = 0.037), difficulty breathing (cOR 6.316, 95% CI 1.96 – 20.34, p = 0.002), and subcostal retractions (cOR 2.842, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.69, p = 0.040) were more likely to have hypoxemia. Conclusion: Pulse oximetry closely correlates with arterial blood gas analysis within acceptable limits of agreement and with no significant differences in variance among measurements. Difficulty breathing, tachypnea and subcostal retractions were significantly more likely to be observed in hypoxemic children.","PeriodicalId":117545,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56964/pidspj20192001005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pulse oximetry is frequently utilized as a rapid, non-invasive, point-of-care alternative to arterial blood gas analysis in measuring oxygen saturation of children with pneumonia. Objectives: To compare portable fingertip pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2PF), handheld pulse oximetry saturation (SpO2H) and arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) in detection of hypoxemia, and correlate hypoxemia with clinical features in children with pneumonia. Methodology: This was a prospective, observational, cross-sectional study involving patients 3 months to 5 years old with pneumonia. Oxygen saturation was measured using a portable fingertip pulse oximeter, a handheld pulse oximeter, and arterial blood gas analysis. Results: Eighty-six children were included. SpO2 PF underestimated oxygen levels by 0.126% (95% CI -0.240 to 0.491), while SpO2H underestimated it by 0.323% (95% CI -0.075 to 0.721). Between portable and handheld readings, the mean difference was 0.198% (95% CI -0.089 to 0.484). Across the three methods, limits of agreement ranged from -3.388 to +4.035%. There was no statistically significant difference in variance among the three measurements. Children with tachypnea (cOR 2.623, 95% CI 1.06 – 6.48, p = 0.037), difficulty breathing (cOR 6.316, 95% CI 1.96 – 20.34, p = 0.002), and subcostal retractions (cOR 2.842, 95% CI 1.05 to 7.69, p = 0.040) were more likely to have hypoxemia. Conclusion: Pulse oximetry closely correlates with arterial blood gas analysis within acceptable limits of agreement and with no significant differences in variance among measurements. Difficulty breathing, tachypnea and subcostal retractions were significantly more likely to be observed in hypoxemic children.
简介:脉搏血氧仪经常被用作一种快速、无创、即时的替代动脉血气分析的方法来测量肺炎患儿的血氧饱和度。目的:比较便携式指尖脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2PF)、手持式脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2H)和动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)对低氧血症的检测效果,并将低氧血症与肺炎患儿的临床特征联系起来。方法:这是一项前瞻性、观察性、横断面研究,涉及3个月至5岁的肺炎患者。使用便携式指尖脉搏血氧仪、手持式脉搏血氧仪和动脉血气分析测量血氧饱和度。结果:共纳入86例儿童。SpO2 PF低估了氧含量0.126% (95% CI -0.240至0.491),而SpO2H低估了氧含量0.323% (95% CI -0.075至0.721)。在便携式和手持读数之间,平均差异为0.198% (95% CI -0.089至0.484)。在三种方法中,一致性的限制范围从-3.388到+4.035%。三种测量方法的方差差异无统计学意义。呼吸急促(cOR 2.623, 95% CI 1.06 - 6.48, p = 0.037)、呼吸困难(cOR 6.316, 95% CI 1.96 - 20.34, p = 0.002)和肋下回缩(cOR 2.842, 95% CI 1.05 - 7.69, p = 0.040)患儿更容易出现低氧血症。结论:脉搏血氧测定与动脉血气分析在可接受的一致性范围内密切相关,且测量值之间的方差无显著差异。呼吸困难、呼吸急促和肋下肌回缩在低氧儿童中更容易出现。