{"title":"ANALISIS KOMPONEN LANGUAGE KERANGKA KERJA ELPSA TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENGAJUKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR KOGNITIF","authors":"Kanti warih ade Indriani, Fauzi Galih Lutfianto","doi":"10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the experience and observation of the author, during this learning of Mathematics generally only solve the problem alone, without familiarize the students to compile their own questions. So that students are less able to use their own language in solving the given problem. Language factor is less calculated as a possible one of the causal factors. ELPSA is a design/learning framework consisting of 5 component sequences, one of which is language. In learning ELPSA students are accustomed to asking productive and effective questions. This study aims to analyze the students' language skills in ELPSA learning design on the ability to issue Mathematical problems in terms of the cognitive thinking style. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this research was conducted in class VIII SMP 1 Maluk. Its divided into two groups. With one group is given conventional learning and one group get learning using ELPSA design. The instrument used is Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) to find out the type of cognitive style of each student and the Matter of Matter Problem Matter. Based on research that has been done, obtained results group of students reflective dominant than Impulsive students. In the student's ability to pose mathematical problems, Reflective student groups are better than Impulsive. While on the average score on the ability to solve Mathematics problems, Learning using ELPSA design is higher than learning without using ELPSA. That is, ELPSA learning design can help students develop language skills especially in raising math problems.","PeriodicalId":109037,"journal":{"name":"Media Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v6i1.1469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
From the experience and observation of the author, during this learning of Mathematics generally only solve the problem alone, without familiarize the students to compile their own questions. So that students are less able to use their own language in solving the given problem. Language factor is less calculated as a possible one of the causal factors. ELPSA is a design/learning framework consisting of 5 component sequences, one of which is language. In learning ELPSA students are accustomed to asking productive and effective questions. This study aims to analyze the students' language skills in ELPSA learning design on the ability to issue Mathematical problems in terms of the cognitive thinking style. This study is a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this research was conducted in class VIII SMP 1 Maluk. Its divided into two groups. With one group is given conventional learning and one group get learning using ELPSA design. The instrument used is Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) to find out the type of cognitive style of each student and the Matter of Matter Problem Matter. Based on research that has been done, obtained results group of students reflective dominant than Impulsive students. In the student's ability to pose mathematical problems, Reflective student groups are better than Impulsive. While on the average score on the ability to solve Mathematics problems, Learning using ELPSA design is higher than learning without using ELPSA. That is, ELPSA learning design can help students develop language skills especially in raising math problems.
从笔者的经验和观察来看,在这种数学学习过程中,学生一般只会单独解题,不熟悉编写自己的问题。这样学生在解决给定问题时就无法使用自己的语言。语言因素作为一种可能的因果因素很少被计算出来。ELPSA是一个由5个组件序列组成的设计/学习框架,其中一个是语言。在学习ELPSA时,学生习惯于提出富有成效和有效的问题。本研究旨在从认知思维方式的角度分析学生在ELPSA学习设计中对数学问题提出能力的语言技能。本研究为描述性质的研究。本研究的对象是8级smp1 Maluk。它分为两组。其中一组采用传统学习方式,另一组采用ELPSA学习方式。使用的工具是匹配熟悉图形测试(MFFT),以找出每个学生的认知风格类型和Matter of Matter Problem Matter。根据已经做过的研究,得出了反思性组学生比冲动性组学生占优势的结果。在学生提出数学问题的能力方面,反思型学生群体优于冲动型学生群体。而在解决数学问题能力的平均得分上,使用ELPSA设计的学习比不使用ELPSA的学习要高。也就是说,ELPSA学习设计可以帮助学生发展语言技能,特别是在提出数学问题方面。