Assessing the Performance of Funds of Hedge Funds

B. Dewaele, H. Pirotte, Nils S. Tuchschmid, Erik Wallerstein
{"title":"Assessing the Performance of Funds of Hedge Funds","authors":"B. Dewaele, H. Pirotte, Nils S. Tuchschmid, Erik Wallerstein","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1929097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the performance of a sample of funds of hedge funds (FoHFs) from January 1994 to August 2009. We apply the false discoveries (FD) technique of Barras, Scaillet and Wermers (2010) to separate the FoHFs into skilled, zero-alpha and unskilled. We measure the alpha of the FoHFs using two models – (1) a 16-factor model with a combination of factors from Fung and Hsieh (2004) and Capocci, Corhay and Hubner (2005) and (2) a 13-factor model of hedge fund indices from Dow Jones Credit Suisse. Applying the FD procedure to the first model, we find that, after fees, the majority of FoHFs do not channel alpha from single-manager hedge funds. Applying the FD procedure to the second model, we find that only a very small fraction of FoHFs deliver after-fees alpha per se, i.e. on top of the alpha of the hedge fund indices. A series of robustness checks confirms the results of the FD procedure. We also compare the performance of our sample of FoHFs to artificial FoHFs constructed by randomly picking hedge funds. The lack of significant differences in the average performance of the real and artificial FoHFs confirms the results obtained by the FD procedure.","PeriodicalId":320868,"journal":{"name":"Performance of Funds of Hedge Funds","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Performance of Funds of Hedge Funds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1929097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper studies the performance of a sample of funds of hedge funds (FoHFs) from January 1994 to August 2009. We apply the false discoveries (FD) technique of Barras, Scaillet and Wermers (2010) to separate the FoHFs into skilled, zero-alpha and unskilled. We measure the alpha of the FoHFs using two models – (1) a 16-factor model with a combination of factors from Fung and Hsieh (2004) and Capocci, Corhay and Hubner (2005) and (2) a 13-factor model of hedge fund indices from Dow Jones Credit Suisse. Applying the FD procedure to the first model, we find that, after fees, the majority of FoHFs do not channel alpha from single-manager hedge funds. Applying the FD procedure to the second model, we find that only a very small fraction of FoHFs deliver after-fees alpha per se, i.e. on top of the alpha of the hedge fund indices. A series of robustness checks confirms the results of the FD procedure. We also compare the performance of our sample of FoHFs to artificial FoHFs constructed by randomly picking hedge funds. The lack of significant differences in the average performance of the real and artificial FoHFs confirms the results obtained by the FD procedure.
评估对冲基金的基金业绩
本文研究了1994年1月至2009年8月对冲基金(FoHFs)样本基金的绩效。我们应用Barras, Scaillet和Wermers(2010)的错误发现(FD)技术将fohf分为熟练的,零阿尔法和非熟练的。我们使用两个模型来测量FoHFs的alpha——(1)由Fung和Hsieh(2004)以及Capocci、Corhay和Hubner(2005)的因素组合而成的16因素模型;(2)由道琼斯瑞士信贷对冲基金指数组成的13因素模型。将FD程序应用于第一个模型,我们发现,扣除费用后,大多数FoHFs不会从单一经理对冲基金中引入alpha。将FD程序应用于第二个模型,我们发现只有很小一部分FoHFs本身提供扣除费用后的alpha,即在对冲基金指数的alpha之上。一系列鲁棒性检查确认了FD过程的结果。我们还比较了我们的FoHFs样本与随机选择对冲基金构建的人工FoHFs的表现。真实FoHFs和人工FoHFs的平均性能没有显著差异,证实了FD程序获得的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信