{"title":"Supervised Neural Networks for RFI Flagging","authors":"Kyle Harrison, A. Mishra","doi":"10.23919/RFI48793.2019.9111748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Neural network (NN) based methods are applied to the detection of radio frequency interference (RFI) in post-correlation, post-calibration time/frequency data. While calibration does affect RFI for the sake of this work a reduced dataset in post-calibration is used. Two machine learning approaches for flagging real measurement data are demonstrated using the existing RFI flagging technique AOFlagger as a ground truth. It is shown that a single layer fully connect network can be trained using each time/frequency sample individually with the magnitude and phase of each polarization and Stokes visibilities as features. This method was able to predict a Boolean flag map for each baseline to a high degree of accuracy achieving a Recall of 0.69 and Precision of 0.83 and an F1-Score of 0.75.The second approach utilizes a convolutional neural network (CNN) implemented in the U-Net architecture, shown in literature to work effectively on simulated radio data. In this work the architecture trained on real data results in a Recall, Precision and F1-Score 0.84, 0.91, 0.87 respectfully.This work seeks to investigate the application of supervised learning when trained on a ground truth from existing flagging techniques, the results of which inherently contain false positives. In order for a fair comparison to be made the data is imaged using CASA’s CLEAN algorithm and the UNet and NN’s flagging results allow for 5 and 6 additional radio sources to be identified respectively.","PeriodicalId":111866,"journal":{"name":"2019 RFI Workshop - Coexisting with Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 RFI Workshop - Coexisting with Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/RFI48793.2019.9111748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Neural network (NN) based methods are applied to the detection of radio frequency interference (RFI) in post-correlation, post-calibration time/frequency data. While calibration does affect RFI for the sake of this work a reduced dataset in post-calibration is used. Two machine learning approaches for flagging real measurement data are demonstrated using the existing RFI flagging technique AOFlagger as a ground truth. It is shown that a single layer fully connect network can be trained using each time/frequency sample individually with the magnitude and phase of each polarization and Stokes visibilities as features. This method was able to predict a Boolean flag map for each baseline to a high degree of accuracy achieving a Recall of 0.69 and Precision of 0.83 and an F1-Score of 0.75.The second approach utilizes a convolutional neural network (CNN) implemented in the U-Net architecture, shown in literature to work effectively on simulated radio data. In this work the architecture trained on real data results in a Recall, Precision and F1-Score 0.84, 0.91, 0.87 respectfully.This work seeks to investigate the application of supervised learning when trained on a ground truth from existing flagging techniques, the results of which inherently contain false positives. In order for a fair comparison to be made the data is imaged using CASA’s CLEAN algorithm and the UNet and NN’s flagging results allow for 5 and 6 additional radio sources to be identified respectively.