Comparison of Intercondylar Notch Width Index and Reverse Notch Width Index in Cases With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

Sachin Gupta, Rakesh Sharma, N. Saini, Y. Saini
{"title":"Comparison of Intercondylar Notch Width Index and Reverse Notch Width Index in Cases With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears","authors":"Sachin Gupta, Rakesh Sharma, N. Saini, Y. Saini","doi":"10.5580/2c4f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare intercondylar notch width index and reverse notch width index in cases with and without anterior cruciate ligament tears. Patients and methods: 33 patients with a positive lachman’s test and pivot shift and a complete ACL tear on MRI were taken as cases. 33 patients with knee pain but a negative Lachman’s test and pivot shift and no ACL tear on MRI were taken as controls. To obtain the radiographic images of femoral intercondylar notch, the Holmblad (1937) method was used. The Notch width index and the Reverse notch width index was calculated for all the cases and controls from radiographic measurements and the results were compared statistically using Pearson chi square test. Results: The maximum number of cases and controls were in the age group 21-30 years with mean age of 28.61 yrs for cases and 28.91 yrs for controls. Maximum number of cases (69.7%) and controls (75.8%) had NWI greater than 0.25. Maximum number of cases (45.5%) and controls (54.5%) had RNWI less than 4.7 indicating wide notch. Conclusion: No significant relation could be established between Notch width Index and Reverse notch width index with anterior cruciate ligament injury.","PeriodicalId":322846,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2c4f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To compare intercondylar notch width index and reverse notch width index in cases with and without anterior cruciate ligament tears. Patients and methods: 33 patients with a positive lachman’s test and pivot shift and a complete ACL tear on MRI were taken as cases. 33 patients with knee pain but a negative Lachman’s test and pivot shift and no ACL tear on MRI were taken as controls. To obtain the radiographic images of femoral intercondylar notch, the Holmblad (1937) method was used. The Notch width index and the Reverse notch width index was calculated for all the cases and controls from radiographic measurements and the results were compared statistically using Pearson chi square test. Results: The maximum number of cases and controls were in the age group 21-30 years with mean age of 28.61 yrs for cases and 28.91 yrs for controls. Maximum number of cases (69.7%) and controls (75.8%) had NWI greater than 0.25. Maximum number of cases (45.5%) and controls (54.5%) had RNWI less than 4.7 indicating wide notch. Conclusion: No significant relation could be established between Notch width Index and Reverse notch width index with anterior cruciate ligament injury.
有无前交叉韧带撕裂的髁间切迹宽度指数与反向切迹宽度指数的比较
目的:比较有无前交叉韧带撕裂的髁间切迹宽度指数和反向切迹宽度指数。患者与方法:以拉赫曼试验阳性、枢轴移位、MRI完全撕裂患者33例为例。以33例膝关节疼痛但拉赫曼试验和枢轴移位阴性且MRI未见前交叉韧带撕裂的患者为对照。为了获得股骨髁间切迹的x线图像,采用Holmblad(1937)方法。计算所有病例和对照放射测量的缺口宽度指数和反向缺口宽度指数,并使用Pearson卡方检验对结果进行统计学比较。结果:21 ~ 30岁为病例和对照组最多,病例和对照组平均年龄分别为28.61岁和28.91岁。NWI大于0.25的病例最多(69.7%),对照组最多(75.8%)。最大比例的病例(45.5%)和对照组(54.5%)RNWI小于4.7,表明缺口较宽。结论:切迹宽度指数和反切迹宽度指数与前交叉韧带损伤无明显关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信