{"title":"Will the True Marginal Investor Please Stand Up?: Asset Prices with Immutable Security Trading by Investors","authors":"P. Swan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.300580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The important and highly influential Amihud and Mendelson (1986) model of asset pricing incorporating immutable security trading by a continuum of investors/traders is unnecessarily opaque because of a flaw in the numerical simulation which I correct. Moreover, the exposition by Kane (1994) and Bodie, Kane and Marcus (2002) also fails to faithfully present the model. Putting aside these presentational issues, I show that the model is flawed because the marginal investor, on whom the analysis rests, cannot be identified. More fundamentally, the model fails to identify the benefits of trading whilst taking account of the costs. This one-sided treatment means that the model as it stands cannot be used to make valid predictions of the impact of transaction costs on asset prices.","PeriodicalId":151935,"journal":{"name":"EFA 2002 Submissions","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFA 2002 Submissions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.300580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The important and highly influential Amihud and Mendelson (1986) model of asset pricing incorporating immutable security trading by a continuum of investors/traders is unnecessarily opaque because of a flaw in the numerical simulation which I correct. Moreover, the exposition by Kane (1994) and Bodie, Kane and Marcus (2002) also fails to faithfully present the model. Putting aside these presentational issues, I show that the model is flawed because the marginal investor, on whom the analysis rests, cannot be identified. More fundamentally, the model fails to identify the benefits of trading whilst taking account of the costs. This one-sided treatment means that the model as it stands cannot be used to make valid predictions of the impact of transaction costs on asset prices.
Amihud和Mendelson(1986)的资产定价模型包含了投资者/交易者连续体的不可变证券交易,由于数值模拟中的一个缺陷,该模型不必要地不透明,我对此进行了纠正。此外,Kane(1994)和Bodie, Kane and Marcus(2002)的阐述也未能忠实地呈现模型。撇开这些表象问题不谈,我认为这个模型是有缺陷的,因为分析所依赖的边际投资者无法被识别。更根本的是,该模型在考虑成本的同时,未能确定交易的收益。这种片面的处理意味着,目前的模型不能用于有效预测交易成本对资产价格的影响。