Shareholder Value, Emerging Economies and the Need to Reconcile the Corporate Objective with Sustainable and Inclusive Goals

Vincenzo Bavoso
{"title":"Shareholder Value, Emerging Economies and the Need to Reconcile the Corporate Objective with Sustainable and Inclusive Goals","authors":"Vincenzo Bavoso","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2719511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The years preceding the wave of US corporate scandals at the turn of the century showed a high degree of convergence in corporate governance ideology and in its practice at the global level. The convergence corresponded with the perceived supremacy of the business model adopted in the US and UK based on shareholder value, on the growth of widely-held firms and the overall reliance on market mechanisms for the regulation of corporate governance. This convergence was due to a number of factors. These can be recognised firstly, with an intellectual dimension, which advanced the application of neoliberal principles in the area of corporate law and governance. This became particularly evident with the implementation of the Washington Consensus policies in areas of market liberalisation and corporate governance and with the direct influence on policymaking exerted by IMF and World Bank. Secondly, at a more practical level, the globalisation of Anglo-American legal, consulting and accounting services prompted the application of shareholder value to businesses in emerging economies, regardless of the underlying socio-economic reality.The sequence of corporate and financial scandals that occurred over the past fifteen years contributed to stir academic debates over the validity of the shareholder value paradigm. Despite much criticism however, the business model centred on the pursuit of share value for the benefit of stockholders has remained the guiding criteria of corporate success. Moreover, neoliberal policies have extended beyond corporate governance, to fundamental areas of market regulation, disregarding relevant institutional factors typical of most emerging economies, such as underdeveloped financial markets or inadequate property rights. This has resulted in institutional arrangements whereby corporate activities have promoted the interests of one constituency – shareholders – ahead of other key social and economic concerns which have been left lacking adequate protection. In the context of emerging economies this problem is accentuated, because the privatisation of large utilities and natural resources companies has attracted foreign investors whose interests are not naturally aligned with local and environmental priorities.This chapter reconceptualises the critique of shareholder value in light of the specific context of emerging economies. It focuses on the necessity to take account of the different nature of large corporations that, due to the nature of their activities and externalities, affect the interests of a wide range of societal interests. The chapter proposes a new institutional framework for the specific regulation of the corporate objective of large public firms.","PeriodicalId":171289,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"18 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2719511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The years preceding the wave of US corporate scandals at the turn of the century showed a high degree of convergence in corporate governance ideology and in its practice at the global level. The convergence corresponded with the perceived supremacy of the business model adopted in the US and UK based on shareholder value, on the growth of widely-held firms and the overall reliance on market mechanisms for the regulation of corporate governance. This convergence was due to a number of factors. These can be recognised firstly, with an intellectual dimension, which advanced the application of neoliberal principles in the area of corporate law and governance. This became particularly evident with the implementation of the Washington Consensus policies in areas of market liberalisation and corporate governance and with the direct influence on policymaking exerted by IMF and World Bank. Secondly, at a more practical level, the globalisation of Anglo-American legal, consulting and accounting services prompted the application of shareholder value to businesses in emerging economies, regardless of the underlying socio-economic reality.The sequence of corporate and financial scandals that occurred over the past fifteen years contributed to stir academic debates over the validity of the shareholder value paradigm. Despite much criticism however, the business model centred on the pursuit of share value for the benefit of stockholders has remained the guiding criteria of corporate success. Moreover, neoliberal policies have extended beyond corporate governance, to fundamental areas of market regulation, disregarding relevant institutional factors typical of most emerging economies, such as underdeveloped financial markets or inadequate property rights. This has resulted in institutional arrangements whereby corporate activities have promoted the interests of one constituency – shareholders – ahead of other key social and economic concerns which have been left lacking adequate protection. In the context of emerging economies this problem is accentuated, because the privatisation of large utilities and natural resources companies has attracted foreign investors whose interests are not naturally aligned with local and environmental priorities.This chapter reconceptualises the critique of shareholder value in light of the specific context of emerging economies. It focuses on the necessity to take account of the different nature of large corporations that, due to the nature of their activities and externalities, affect the interests of a wide range of societal interests. The chapter proposes a new institutional framework for the specific regulation of the corporate objective of large public firms.
股东价值、新兴经济体以及协调企业目标与可持续和包容性目标的必要性
在世纪之交美国公司丑闻浪潮之前的几年里,全球范围内的公司治理意识形态及其实践出现了高度趋同。这种趋同与美国和英国所采用的基于股东价值、广泛控股公司的增长以及全面依赖市场机制来监管公司治理的商业模式的公认优势相一致。这种趋同是由许多因素造成的。首先,我们可以从知识层面认识到这一点,它推动了新自由主义原则在公司法和治理领域的应用。在市场自由化和公司治理领域实施华盛顿共识政策以及国际货币基金组织和世界银行对决策施加直接影响时,这一点尤为明显。其次,在更实际的层面上,英美法律、咨询和会计服务的全球化推动了股东价值在新兴经济体企业中的应用,而不顾潜在的社会经济现实。过去15年发生的一系列公司和金融丑闻,引发了关于股东价值范式有效性的学术辩论。然而,尽管有很多批评,但以追求股东利益的股票价值为中心的商业模式仍然是企业成功的指导标准。此外,新自由主义政策已经超越公司治理,延伸到市场监管的基本领域,忽视了大多数新兴经济体典型的相关制度因素,如不发达的金融市场或不充分的产权。这导致了一些体制安排,在这些安排中,公司活动把一个支持者- -股东- -的利益置于其他关键的社会和经济问题之上,而这些问题缺乏足够的保护。在新兴经济体的背景下,这一问题更加突出,因为大型公用事业和自然资源公司的私有化吸引了外国投资者,而这些投资者的利益与当地和环境优先事项并不自然一致。本章结合新兴经济体的具体背景,对股东价值的批判进行了重新定义。它的重点是必须考虑到大公司的不同性质,这些大公司由于其活动的性质和外部因素,影响到广泛的社会利益。本章为大型上市公司公司目标的具体规制提出了一个新的制度框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信