{"title":"Fitting the Truncated Pareto Distribution to Loss Distributions","authors":"A. V. Boyd","doi":"10.1017/S2049929900010291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hogg and Klugman use the truncated Pareto distribution with probability density function where δ ≥0 is specified and α > 0 and λ > 0 are unknown parameters, to describe insurance claims. This is fitted first of all by the method of moments, using the estimators and where is the mean of a simple random sample, and the (biased) variance The authors then suggest, on pp. 113–16, that these estimates be used as starting values in a Newton iteration to get the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters, but this technique can fail as a result of convergence problems. The object of this note is to show that this has led Hogg and Klugman to underestimate seriously the area in the tail of a fitted loss distribution, and to discuss a method of circumventing this difficulty.","PeriodicalId":419781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Staple Inn Actuarial Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2049929900010291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Hogg and Klugman use the truncated Pareto distribution with probability density function where δ ≥0 is specified and α > 0 and λ > 0 are unknown parameters, to describe insurance claims. This is fitted first of all by the method of moments, using the estimators and where is the mean of a simple random sample, and the (biased) variance The authors then suggest, on pp. 113–16, that these estimates be used as starting values in a Newton iteration to get the maximum likelihood estimates of the parameters, but this technique can fail as a result of convergence problems. The object of this note is to show that this has led Hogg and Klugman to underestimate seriously the area in the tail of a fitted loss distribution, and to discuss a method of circumventing this difficulty.