Evaluating Bug Severity Using Crowd-based Knowledge: An Exploratory Study

Yang Zhang, Gang Yin, Tao Wang, Yue Yu, Huaimin Wang
{"title":"Evaluating Bug Severity Using Crowd-based Knowledge: An Exploratory Study","authors":"Yang Zhang, Gang Yin, Tao Wang, Yue Yu, Huaimin Wang","doi":"10.1145/2875913.2875918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In bug tracking system, the high volume of incoming bug reports poses a serious challenge to project managers. Triaging these bug reports manually consumes time and resources which leads to delaying the resolution of important bugs. StackOverflow is the most popular crowdsourcing Q&A community with plenty of bug-related posts. In this paper, we explore the correlation between bug severity and the crowd attributes of linked posts. Two typical types of projects' bug repositories are studied here, e.g. Mozilla (user-centric project) and Eclipse (developer-centric project). Our results show that the bug severity is consistent with the crowd-based knowledge both in Mozilla and Eclipse, i.e. the linked posts of severe bugs have higher score etc. in StackOverflow than non-severe bugs. This interesting phenomenon inspires us that we can optimize the existing evaluation methods of bug severity by incorporating the crowd-based knowledge from a third-party in future.","PeriodicalId":361135,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 7th Asia-Pacific Symposium on Internetware","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2875913.2875918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In bug tracking system, the high volume of incoming bug reports poses a serious challenge to project managers. Triaging these bug reports manually consumes time and resources which leads to delaying the resolution of important bugs. StackOverflow is the most popular crowdsourcing Q&A community with plenty of bug-related posts. In this paper, we explore the correlation between bug severity and the crowd attributes of linked posts. Two typical types of projects' bug repositories are studied here, e.g. Mozilla (user-centric project) and Eclipse (developer-centric project). Our results show that the bug severity is consistent with the crowd-based knowledge both in Mozilla and Eclipse, i.e. the linked posts of severe bugs have higher score etc. in StackOverflow than non-severe bugs. This interesting phenomenon inspires us that we can optimize the existing evaluation methods of bug severity by incorporating the crowd-based knowledge from a third-party in future.
使用基于群体的知识评估漏洞严重性:一项探索性研究
在bug跟踪系统中,大量传入的bug报告给项目经理带来了严峻的挑战。手动筛选这些bug报告会消耗时间和资源,从而导致延迟重要bug的解决。StackOverflow是最受欢迎的众包问答社区,有很多与bug相关的帖子。在本文中,我们探讨了漏洞严重性与链接帖子的人群属性之间的相关性。这里研究了两种典型的项目bug库,例如Mozilla(以用户为中心的项目)和Eclipse(以开发人员为中心的项目)。我们的研究结果表明,在Mozilla和Eclipse中,bug的严重程度与基于人群的认知是一致的,即严重bug的链接帖子在StackOverflow中的得分等高于非严重bug的链接帖子。这个有趣的现象启发了我们,我们可以在未来通过整合来自第三方的基于人群的知识来优化现有的漏洞严重性评估方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信