The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century

Z. Kuhn
{"title":"The Ryneš Case and Liability for Invasion of Privacy in the 21st Century","authors":"Z. Kuhn","doi":"10.3935/CYELP.14.2018.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"New technologies combined with the internet have fundamentally altered our ability to have control over the diffusion of information and its impact on human behaviour. This paper explains this change as well as the transformation of the concept of privacy itself. The main part of the paper analyses the case law relating to local activities such as CCTV cameras in private buildings which serve to protect the property of the camera system operators. The author defends the regulation of privacy against the intrusions of providers of telecommunications and data services and corporations such as Google and Facebook. This should be exercised by the law of the EU because autonomous domestic regulation would endanger the free movement of services across the EU. Moreover, it would be difficult for separate national regulation to be successful in fighting global corporations like Google. On the other hand, there is not much sense in the European regulation of activities that are local by their very nature, such as the use of CCTV cameras in private buildings to protect the camera system operators’ property.","PeriodicalId":137938,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/CYELP.14.2018.302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

New technologies combined with the internet have fundamentally altered our ability to have control over the diffusion of information and its impact on human behaviour. This paper explains this change as well as the transformation of the concept of privacy itself. The main part of the paper analyses the case law relating to local activities such as CCTV cameras in private buildings which serve to protect the property of the camera system operators. The author defends the regulation of privacy against the intrusions of providers of telecommunications and data services and corporations such as Google and Facebook. This should be exercised by the law of the EU because autonomous domestic regulation would endanger the free movement of services across the EU. Moreover, it would be difficult for separate national regulation to be successful in fighting global corporations like Google. On the other hand, there is not much sense in the European regulation of activities that are local by their very nature, such as the use of CCTV cameras in private buildings to protect the camera system operators’ property.
21世纪的莱内什案与侵犯隐私权的责任
与互联网相结合的新技术从根本上改变了我们控制信息传播及其对人类行为影响的能力。本文阐述了这种变化以及隐私概念本身的转变。本文的主要部分分析了与地方活动有关的判例法,如私人建筑物中的闭路电视摄像机,以保护摄像机系统操作员的财产。作者为隐私监管辩护,反对电信和数据服务提供商以及b谷歌和Facebook等公司的侵犯。这应由欧盟法律行使,因为自主的国内监管将危及服务在欧盟范围内的自由流动。此外,单独的国家监管很难成功地打击像bbco这样的跨国公司。另一方面,欧洲对地方性活动的监管没有多大意义,例如在私人建筑物中使用闭路电视摄像机以保护摄像机系统操作员的财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信