Evaluation of Different Improvement Methods of Bonding Between The Denture Base and Silicone-Based Liner

Mostafa Abosrie, Maged El saadawy, A. Mohamed
{"title":"Evaluation of Different Improvement Methods of Bonding Between The Denture Base and Silicone-Based Liner","authors":"Mostafa Abosrie, Maged El saadawy, A. Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2018.53938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Failure of the bond between the acrylic resin and silicone based liner material is commonly encountered in clinical practice. PURPOSE: Examine effect of different treatment methods on the   tensile bond strength between a silicone –based liner and denture base before and after the thermocycling.  MATERIAL AND METHODS: 140 test samples were fabricated. The samples were divided into 14 groups (n=10), according to the treatments applied. To enhance the bonding capacity between these materials, acrylic resin surface was modified using acetone, methyl methacrylate(MMA),isobutylmethacrylate(IBMA), 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (2-HEMA), sandblasted with110 μm aluminum oxide particles (110 μmAL2O3) and combination between sandblasting and each of these chemical material individually while in the group 11 ,silicone based liner was immersed in IBMA but in the group 12, acrylic resin surface was modified using sandblasting and a silicone based liner was immersed in IBMA .in addition ,in the  group 13; silicone based liner was immersed in 2-HEMA  and Group 14, acrylic resin surface was modified using Sandblasting and silicone based liner was immersed in2-HEMA. Silicone based liner was processed between 2 PMMA blocks. In each group, five samples were thermo cycled in water bath (5-55˚C) 500 cycles before tensile testing, whereas the other five were directly tested without thermocycling using Instron testing machine with speed rate (1 mm/minute) to measure tensile bond strength by MPa. All data were statistically analyzed by One way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc test and Paired sample t-test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between all tested groups where (p=0.154) before thermocycling while after the thermocycling, there was a statistically significant difference between all tested groups where (p=0.001) but there was no a statistically significant difference between control and all other tested groups. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between before and after thermocycling in each group except group 9. CONCLUSIONS: The different treatment methods had poor effect on the tensile bond strength. Thermocycling had poor effect on the tensile bond strength between a silicone –based liner and denture base except group9 (acrylic resin surface was modified using sandblasting followed by IBMA application).","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2018.53938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Failure of the bond between the acrylic resin and silicone based liner material is commonly encountered in clinical practice. PURPOSE: Examine effect of different treatment methods on the   tensile bond strength between a silicone –based liner and denture base before and after the thermocycling.  MATERIAL AND METHODS: 140 test samples were fabricated. The samples were divided into 14 groups (n=10), according to the treatments applied. To enhance the bonding capacity between these materials, acrylic resin surface was modified using acetone, methyl methacrylate(MMA),isobutylmethacrylate(IBMA), 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (2-HEMA), sandblasted with110 μm aluminum oxide particles (110 μmAL2O3) and combination between sandblasting and each of these chemical material individually while in the group 11 ,silicone based liner was immersed in IBMA but in the group 12, acrylic resin surface was modified using sandblasting and a silicone based liner was immersed in IBMA .in addition ,in the  group 13; silicone based liner was immersed in 2-HEMA  and Group 14, acrylic resin surface was modified using Sandblasting and silicone based liner was immersed in2-HEMA. Silicone based liner was processed between 2 PMMA blocks. In each group, five samples were thermo cycled in water bath (5-55˚C) 500 cycles before tensile testing, whereas the other five were directly tested without thermocycling using Instron testing machine with speed rate (1 mm/minute) to measure tensile bond strength by MPa. All data were statistically analyzed by One way ANOVA, Tukey post hoc test and Paired sample t-test. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between all tested groups where (p=0.154) before thermocycling while after the thermocycling, there was a statistically significant difference between all tested groups where (p=0.001) but there was no a statistically significant difference between control and all other tested groups. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference between before and after thermocycling in each group except group 9. CONCLUSIONS: The different treatment methods had poor effect on the tensile bond strength. Thermocycling had poor effect on the tensile bond strength between a silicone –based liner and denture base except group9 (acrylic resin surface was modified using sandblasting followed by IBMA application).
改良义齿基托与硅基衬板粘接方法的评价
问题陈述:在临床实践中,丙烯酸树脂和硅基衬垫材料之间的粘合失败是常见的。目的:研究热循环前后不同处理方法对硅胶衬垫与义齿基托抗拉结合强度的影响。材料与方法:制作140个试样。根据处理方法的不同,将样本分为14组(n=10)。为了提高材料之间的结合能力,采用丙酮、甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)、甲基丙烯酸异丁基酯(IBMA)、甲基丙烯酸羟乙基酯(2-HEMA)对丙烯酸树脂表面进行了改性,用110 μm氧化铝颗粒(110 μmAL2O3)喷砂,并分别与这些化学物质联合喷砂。第13组采用喷砂法对丙烯酸树脂表面进行改性,并用IBMA浸泡有机硅基衬垫;将硅基衬垫浸入2-HEMA和基团14中,喷砂改性丙烯酸树脂表面,将硅基衬垫浸入2-HEMA中。硅基衬垫在2块PMMA块之间加工。每组5个样品在5-55℃的水浴中热循环500次后进行拉伸试验,其余5个样品在Instron试验机上以1 mm/min的速度直接进行热循环试验,以MPa为单位测量拉伸结合强度。所有数据均采用单因素方差分析、Tukey事后检验和配对样本t检验进行统计学分析。结果:热循环前各组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.154),热循环后各组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.001),对照组与其他各组间差异无统计学意义(p=0.001)。除第9组外,各组热循环前后差异无统计学意义。结论:不同处理方法对抗拉粘结强度影响较差。除第9组(丙烯酸树脂表面喷砂后应用IBMA进行改性)外,热循环对硅树脂衬垫与义齿基托之间的拉伸结合强度影响较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信