“UNFORTUNATELY, I USE MY CAR”: COMMUTER TRANSPORT CHOICES IN BRISTOL, UK
Corra Boushel, J. Barnes, T. Chatterton, Laura Devito, A. Edwards, L. F. Rogers, Mark. Leach, E. Prestwood, E. Hayes
{"title":"“UNFORTUNATELY, I USE MY CAR”: COMMUTER TRANSPORT CHOICES IN BRISTOL, UK","authors":"Corra Boushel, J. Barnes, T. Chatterton, Laura Devito, A. Edwards, L. F. Rogers, Mark. Leach, E. Prestwood, E. Hayes","doi":"10.2495/AIR180231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2018 WIT Press. The leading source of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations in Bristol, United Kingdom is road transport, and Bristol exceeds the annual mean national air quality objective of 40 µg/m3 for NO2 in many locations around the city. Understanding the reasons for residents' modal choice is an important element in managing air quality in the city. The ClairCity Project approach provides insight into how to reduce overall transport demand and identify incentives that will be effective in creating modal switch away from higher polluting private motorised vehicles. From the ClairCity Project survey subset of commuters (n=442), 45% of respondents used cars or vans at least occasionally for their journey to work, with 28% of the total number of commuters relying exclusively on private motorised transport. The majority of these car users (65.6%) said they would prefer not to travel by car to work in the future. Their responses showed a mix of negative perceptions of public transport, geography and health as key motivations. Family responsibilities, lack of safe cycling and walking spaces, poor health and disability, distance, requirements to transport goods as well as themselves and the need for flexibility were all given as barriers to modal switching. This suggests that for car commuters, well-targeted policy interventions could provide practical alternatives that would appeal to those who currently rely on private motorised transport. Understanding citizens' perceptions, behaviours and activities is a key element in decision-making to reduce transport related air quality emissions and concentrations.","PeriodicalId":165416,"journal":{"name":"Air Pollution XXVI","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Pollution XXVI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/AIR180231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
© 2018 WIT Press. The leading source of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations in Bristol, United Kingdom is road transport, and Bristol exceeds the annual mean national air quality objective of 40 µg/m3 for NO2 in many locations around the city. Understanding the reasons for residents' modal choice is an important element in managing air quality in the city. The ClairCity Project approach provides insight into how to reduce overall transport demand and identify incentives that will be effective in creating modal switch away from higher polluting private motorised vehicles. From the ClairCity Project survey subset of commuters (n=442), 45% of respondents used cars or vans at least occasionally for their journey to work, with 28% of the total number of commuters relying exclusively on private motorised transport. The majority of these car users (65.6%) said they would prefer not to travel by car to work in the future. Their responses showed a mix of negative perceptions of public transport, geography and health as key motivations. Family responsibilities, lack of safe cycling and walking spaces, poor health and disability, distance, requirements to transport goods as well as themselves and the need for flexibility were all given as barriers to modal switching. This suggests that for car commuters, well-targeted policy interventions could provide practical alternatives that would appeal to those who currently rely on private motorised transport. Understanding citizens' perceptions, behaviours and activities is a key element in decision-making to reduce transport related air quality emissions and concentrations.
“不幸的是,我用我的车”:英国布里斯托尔的通勤交通选择
©2018 WIT出版社。在英国布里斯托尔,二氧化氮(NO2)浓度的主要来源是道路运输,布里斯托尔在城市周围的许多地方超过了每年平均40微克/立方米的国家空气质量目标。了解居民交通方式选择的原因是管理城市空气质量的重要因素。ClairCity项目的方法提供了如何减少整体交通需求的见解,并确定了有效的激励措施,以实现从高污染的私人机动车辆的模式转换。从ClairCity项目对通勤者的调查子集(n=442)来看,45%的受访者至少偶尔使用汽车或货车上班,28%的通勤者完全依赖私人机动交通工具。这些汽车使用者中的大多数(65.6%)表示,他们不希望未来开车上班。他们的回答显示,对公共交通、地理位置和健康等主要动机的看法不一。家庭责任、缺乏安全的骑行和步行空间、健康状况不佳和残疾、距离、运输货物和自身的要求以及灵活性的需要都被认为是模式转换的障碍。这表明,对于汽车通勤者来说,有针对性的政策干预可以提供实际的替代方案,吸引那些目前依赖私人机动交通的人。了解市民的观念、行为和活动是减少交通相关空气质量排放和浓度决策的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。