TACAM: Topic And Context Aware Argument Mining

Michael Fromm, Evgeniy Faerman, T. Seidl
{"title":"TACAM: Topic And Context Aware Argument Mining","authors":"Michael Fromm, Evgeniy Faerman, T. Seidl","doi":"10.1145/3350546.3352506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work we address the problem of argument search. The purpose of argument search is the distillation of pro and contra arguments for requested topics from large text corpora. In previous works, the usual approach is to use a standard search engine to extract text parts which are relevant to the given topic and subsequently use an argument recognition algorithm to select arguments from them. The main challenge in the argument recognition task, which is also known as argument mining, is that often sentences containing arguments are structurally similar to purely informative sentences without any stance about the topic. In fact, they only differ semantically. Most approaches use topic or search term information only for the first search step and therefore assume that arguments can be classified independently of a topic. We argue that topic information is crucial for argument mining, since the topic defines the semantic context of an argument. Precisely, we propose different models for the classification of arguments, which take information about a topic of an argument into account. Moreover, to enrich the context of a topic and to let models understand the context of the potential argument better, we integrate information from different external sources such as Knowledge Graphs or pre-trained NLP models. Our evaluation shows that considering topic information, especially in connection with external information, provides a significant performance boost for the argument mining task.","PeriodicalId":171168,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3350546.3352506","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In this work we address the problem of argument search. The purpose of argument search is the distillation of pro and contra arguments for requested topics from large text corpora. In previous works, the usual approach is to use a standard search engine to extract text parts which are relevant to the given topic and subsequently use an argument recognition algorithm to select arguments from them. The main challenge in the argument recognition task, which is also known as argument mining, is that often sentences containing arguments are structurally similar to purely informative sentences without any stance about the topic. In fact, they only differ semantically. Most approaches use topic or search term information only for the first search step and therefore assume that arguments can be classified independently of a topic. We argue that topic information is crucial for argument mining, since the topic defines the semantic context of an argument. Precisely, we propose different models for the classification of arguments, which take information about a topic of an argument into account. Moreover, to enrich the context of a topic and to let models understand the context of the potential argument better, we integrate information from different external sources such as Knowledge Graphs or pre-trained NLP models. Our evaluation shows that considering topic information, especially in connection with external information, provides a significant performance boost for the argument mining task.
主题和上下文感知论证挖掘
在这项工作中,我们解决了论点搜索的问题。论点搜索的目的是从大型文本语料库中提取请求主题的正反论点。在以前的工作中,通常的方法是使用标准搜索引擎提取与给定主题相关的文本部分,然后使用参数识别算法从中选择参数。论点识别任务(也称为论点挖掘)的主要挑战是,通常包含论点的句子在结构上类似于没有任何关于主题立场的纯信息句子。事实上,它们只是在语义上有所不同。大多数方法仅在第一个搜索步骤中使用主题或搜索词信息,因此假设参数可以独立于主题进行分类。我们认为主题信息对论证挖掘至关重要,因为主题定义了论证的语义上下文。准确地说,我们提出了不同的论点分类模型,这些模型考虑了关于论点主题的信息。此外,为了丰富主题的上下文,并让模型更好地理解潜在论点的上下文,我们整合了来自不同外部来源的信息,如知识图或预训练的NLP模型。我们的评估表明,考虑主题信息,特别是与外部信息的联系,为参数挖掘任务提供了显着的性能提升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信