A Comparison between Agile and Traditional Software Development Methodologies

A. Islam, A. Ferworn
{"title":"A Comparison between Agile and Traditional Software Development Methodologies","authors":"A. Islam, A. Ferworn","doi":"10.34257/GJCSTCVOL20IS2PG7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agile and Traditional software development methodologies, both are being used in different projects of software development industry. Agile software development technology is an incremental software development process. On the other hand, Traditional software development methodologies or plan-driven software can be explained as a more formal approach to software development. These methodologies come with a fully completed set of systems requirements followed by an architectural and high level design development and inspiration. \nThis research focuses on the software development life cycle, role and responsibilities of agile and traditional software development methodologies and their technical practices. It performs a comparison between both the software development methodologies. Here a questionnaire is used to collect data from the various experts of different IT related organizations of Bangladesh. In the questionnaire, there are three sections to bring out the individual knowledge from different organization, methodology knowledge of the respondents and software development experience of the respondents. The respondents are mainly software engineer, system analyst, software developer etc. A comparison is also performed between this survey result and a survey done by Ambler.","PeriodicalId":340110,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of computer science and technology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of computer science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34257/GJCSTCVOL20IS2PG7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Agile and Traditional software development methodologies, both are being used in different projects of software development industry. Agile software development technology is an incremental software development process. On the other hand, Traditional software development methodologies or plan-driven software can be explained as a more formal approach to software development. These methodologies come with a fully completed set of systems requirements followed by an architectural and high level design development and inspiration. This research focuses on the software development life cycle, role and responsibilities of agile and traditional software development methodologies and their technical practices. It performs a comparison between both the software development methodologies. Here a questionnaire is used to collect data from the various experts of different IT related organizations of Bangladesh. In the questionnaire, there are three sections to bring out the individual knowledge from different organization, methodology knowledge of the respondents and software development experience of the respondents. The respondents are mainly software engineer, system analyst, software developer etc. A comparison is also performed between this survey result and a survey done by Ambler.
敏捷和传统软件开发方法的比较
敏捷和传统的软件开发方法,两者都被用于软件开发行业的不同项目中。敏捷软件开发技术是一种增量式的软件开发过程。另一方面,传统的软件开发方法或计划驱动软件可以被解释为一种更正式的软件开发方法。这些方法伴随着一组完整的系统需求,然后是架构和高级设计开发和灵感。本研究的重点是软件开发生命周期、敏捷和传统软件开发方法的作用和责任以及它们的技术实践。它对两种软件开发方法进行了比较。在这里,我们使用问卷来收集来自孟加拉国不同IT相关组织的各种专家的数据。在问卷中,有三个部分来引出来自不同组织的个人知识,受访者的方法论知识和受访者的软件开发经验。受访者主要是软件工程师、系统分析师、软件开发人员等。并将该调查结果与Ambler的调查结果进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信