Topical fluoride treatment effectiveness: a systematic review

E. Brusnitsyna, D. A. Ginkel, A. Prihodkin, T. Zakirov, E. S. Ioshchenko, A. S. Shishmareva
{"title":"Topical fluoride treatment effectiveness: a systematic review","authors":"E. Brusnitsyna, D. A. Ginkel, A. Prihodkin, T. Zakirov, E. S. Ioshchenko, A. S. Shishmareva","doi":"10.33925/1683-3031-2023-598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical fluoride in children based on the analysis of modern randomized clinical trial (RCT) data.Materials and methods. This review was carried out using the PRISMA checklist (the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The proposed criteria determined the quality of the studies for inclusion in the review and then during the result summary. A preliminary search was conducted among articles published between 2013 and 2023 where fluoride varnishes were one of the preventive products. The search included MeSH terms, the keywords \"fluorides\", \"fluorine varnish\", \"caries prevention\", \"remineralisation\", and \"children\". A preliminary search found 346 studies. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant studies, two independent reviewers analysed nine RCTs based on the PRISMA criteria.Results. Children aged eight months to five years old participated in five out of nine RCTs on the fluoride varnish application included in the review, and four studies included adolescents aged 14–20 y.o. The duration of the studies ranged from 2 months to 3.5 years. Six studies described the use of fluoride varnish in children, and three studies reported on the application of calcium phosphate gels with fluoride versus fluoride varnish. Various ways determined enamel condition, namely, visual method, digitally processed photography, analysis of radiographs, QLF (quantitative light fluorescence method), and laser fluorescence analysis method (Diagnodent). The dmft, ICDAS indices, caries increment, the WSL (white spot lesion) index, and the assessment of changes in the tooth damage area evaluated the prevalence and intensity of caries. In the control groups, most studies used 1000 to 1500 ppm fluoride toothpastes according to the usual scheme. None of the studies statistically proved the additional preventive effectiveness of the fluoride varnishes.Conclusions. The analysis of RCTs did not reveal the advantages of fluoride varnishes for caries prevention in children and adolescents compared to standard oral hygiene procedures using fluoride toothpastes.","PeriodicalId":196403,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry and dental prophylaxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33925/1683-3031-2023-598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Relevance. The systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical fluoride in children based on the analysis of modern randomized clinical trial (RCT) data.Materials and methods. This review was carried out using the PRISMA checklist (the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). The proposed criteria determined the quality of the studies for inclusion in the review and then during the result summary. A preliminary search was conducted among articles published between 2013 and 2023 where fluoride varnishes were one of the preventive products. The search included MeSH terms, the keywords "fluorides", "fluorine varnish", "caries prevention", "remineralisation", and "children". A preliminary search found 346 studies. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant studies, two independent reviewers analysed nine RCTs based on the PRISMA criteria.Results. Children aged eight months to five years old participated in five out of nine RCTs on the fluoride varnish application included in the review, and four studies included adolescents aged 14–20 y.o. The duration of the studies ranged from 2 months to 3.5 years. Six studies described the use of fluoride varnish in children, and three studies reported on the application of calcium phosphate gels with fluoride versus fluoride varnish. Various ways determined enamel condition, namely, visual method, digitally processed photography, analysis of radiographs, QLF (quantitative light fluorescence method), and laser fluorescence analysis method (Diagnodent). The dmft, ICDAS indices, caries increment, the WSL (white spot lesion) index, and the assessment of changes in the tooth damage area evaluated the prevalence and intensity of caries. In the control groups, most studies used 1000 to 1500 ppm fluoride toothpastes according to the usual scheme. None of the studies statistically proved the additional preventive effectiveness of the fluoride varnishes.Conclusions. The analysis of RCTs did not reveal the advantages of fluoride varnishes for caries prevention in children and adolescents compared to standard oral hygiene procedures using fluoride toothpastes.
局部氟化物治疗效果:系统评价
的相关性。本系统综述旨在通过对现代随机临床试验(RCT)数据的分析,评价儿童局部氟化治疗的有效性。材料和方法。本综述采用PRISMA清单(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)进行。建议的标准确定了纳入综述和结果总结的研究质量。对2013年至2023年间发表的文章进行了初步调查,其中氟化物清漆是预防产品之一。搜索包括MeSH术语,关键词是“氟化物”、“氟清漆”、“龋齿预防”、“再矿化”和“儿童”。初步调查发现了346项研究。在排除重复和不相关的研究后,两位独立审稿人根据PRISMA标准分析了9项随机对照试验。8个月至5岁的儿童参与了本综述中关于氟清漆应用的9项随机对照试验中的5项,4项研究纳入了14-20岁的青少年。研究的持续时间从2个月到3.5年不等。六项研究描述了氟清漆在儿童中的使用,三项研究报告了磷酸钙凝胶与氟清漆的应用。测定牙釉质状况的方法多种多样,即目测法、数字处理摄影、x线片分析、定量光荧光法(QLF)和激光荧光分析法(诊断法)。通过dmft、ICDAS指数、蛀牙增量、白斑病变指数、牙损伤面积变化评估来评价龋病的发生率和强度。在对照组中,大多数研究按照通常的方案使用1000到1500 ppm的氟化物牙膏。没有一项研究在统计上证明了含氟清漆的额外预防效果。与使用含氟牙膏的标准口腔卫生程序相比,对随机对照试验的分析并没有揭示含氟清漆在儿童和青少年预防龋齿方面的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信