Service Innovation Management Models: Planned, Iterative and Emergent Innovations

Carla M Kitsuta, R. Quadros
{"title":"Service Innovation Management Models: Planned, Iterative and Emergent Innovations","authors":"Carla M Kitsuta, R. Quadros","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although service innovations present characteristics that make them different from innovation in goods, literature presents traditional innovation management models, whose development has been based on the experience of manufacturing industries, as valid and applicable to service companies. Service innovation may take place in multiple dimensions, considering technological and non-technological elements. It may result from planned efforts, but can also emerge from the service practice, what indicates that these models may not be the only way open to service companies. The present article analyzes whether reference models for innovation management, which have influenced new product and service development activities, are suitable and adopted by service companies in the information technology (IT) sector in Brazil. We analyzed data from 10 Brazilian IT service companies, supplying software development, systems integration and mobile services development. Findings suggest that traditional reference models for innovation management are suitable to service companies, but three other possibilities were identified. These possibilities relate to the innovation processes discussed by Toivonen (2010) and are identified here as (i) compression rapid application model, (ii) experiential rapid application model and (iii) practice-driven model. Even though innovation management models are not able to capture all diversity present in service sectors, acknowledgement of the different service innovation dimensions and innovation processes allow service companies to improve their understanding, develop competencies, and organize better their innovation efforts.","PeriodicalId":438177,"journal":{"name":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Although service innovations present characteristics that make them different from innovation in goods, literature presents traditional innovation management models, whose development has been based on the experience of manufacturing industries, as valid and applicable to service companies. Service innovation may take place in multiple dimensions, considering technological and non-technological elements. It may result from planned efforts, but can also emerge from the service practice, what indicates that these models may not be the only way open to service companies. The present article analyzes whether reference models for innovation management, which have influenced new product and service development activities, are suitable and adopted by service companies in the information technology (IT) sector in Brazil. We analyzed data from 10 Brazilian IT service companies, supplying software development, systems integration and mobile services development. Findings suggest that traditional reference models for innovation management are suitable to service companies, but three other possibilities were identified. These possibilities relate to the innovation processes discussed by Toivonen (2010) and are identified here as (i) compression rapid application model, (ii) experiential rapid application model and (iii) practice-driven model. Even though innovation management models are not able to capture all diversity present in service sectors, acknowledgement of the different service innovation dimensions and innovation processes allow service companies to improve their understanding, develop competencies, and organize better their innovation efforts.
服务创新管理模式:计划创新、迭代创新和紧急创新
虽然服务创新呈现出不同于商品创新的特点,但文献提出了传统的创新管理模式,其发展是基于制造业的经验,对服务公司是有效的和适用的。服务创新可以在多个维度上进行,考虑到技术和非技术因素。它可能来自计划好的努力,但也可能来自服务实践,这表明这些模型可能不是服务公司的唯一途径。本文分析了影响新产品和服务开发活动的创新管理参考模型是否适合并被巴西信息技术(IT)部门的服务公司采用。我们分析了10家巴西IT服务公司的数据,这些公司提供软件开发、系统集成和移动服务开发。研究结果表明,传统的创新管理参考模型适用于服务型企业,但还发现了其他三种可能性。这些可能性与Toivonen(2010)讨论的创新过程有关,并在这里确定为(i)压缩快速应用模型,(ii)经验快速应用模型和(iii)实践驱动模型。尽管创新管理模式无法捕捉到服务行业中存在的所有多样性,但认识到不同的服务创新维度和创新过程,可以使服务公司提高对创新的理解,发展能力,并更好地组织创新工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信